Black ops, AW and ghosts are near future... Titanfall is full sci-fi.
The time to kill...
how many actual Futuristic FPS games have their been this gen? 4 maybe 5? how can you be sick of them when there has been way more Modern day/ Near future shooters. Titanfall, Destiny, Halo and Battlefront are the only Futuristic shooters out at the moment... How can you be sick of them?
+ It's DICE and they know how to make a good game when they have the time and a game with stacks of content especially the Battlefield series.
I don't understand how ...
one game?
2142 sequel would be a proper futuristic game not these near future games that you are actually sick off...
Duke Nukem isn't the only one, Brothers In Arms Hells Highway had loads of delays ended up bad same with Watch dogs got delayed multiple times and ended up being poor.
Delays are not always a good thing. Not saying Uncharted 4 is going to be bad because it's very likely going to be the best game this year but people thinking delays are always a good thing aren't really right.
@Bolts Battlefront is not 30 fps on the consoles. Yes its a poor game but it's a gorgeous game and runs at unlocked 60 fps, it's performance is un questionable on all platforms.
Battlefront proves that games can look fantastic and perform great on both systems just takes time. Yes the games mediocre but performance wise battlefront shows what the consoles are capable of if the time is taken.
Some one had to say it.
These games are more about the themes and art styles, Bloodborne isn't exactly good looking but it has a great art style. Same with the souls games.
if this fails there might not be anymore Hitman...
GoW 2 had a decent ish SP but it's MP was broken and bad in every way, Bigger better more bad ass is NOT what Gears 2 was. Gears 1 and 3 are both better than 2 by a long way especially for the MP.
GoW 2 is the worst one... Even Judgement was better.
Ye but he's listed games that you CAN'T play on PS4 or Wii...
You cant compare xbox and PS exclusives as PS exclusives are never going to be on PC EVER. There is nothing wrong with Xbox games being on PC as well as it's Win Win for Microsoft and Gamers. Doesn't mean those big Xbox/windows 10 games are bad when they will be just as good as anything Sony can put out...
Brain dead fan boys will be brain dead fanboys. They are as close as you can get in terms of ratings, one has a great MP the other has a great story.
Half Life 3 can only be a huge disappointment now, peoples expectations are way too high now.
You forget the part where majority of AAA games are better on PC... Then there is the insane amount of smaller indie devs making greats games on PC only. AAA games arent the be all and end all of gaming as if it's all you play then you are missing out on some of the best games over the past few years. There are a few AAA PC only devs such as Creative Assembly with Total War (Now going into console more though with the Halo Wars 2 and Alien Isolation.) Then there is Bohemia interactive wit...
version 1.0 is also easier with enemies HP being less and damage being reduced so your not really getting the "true" souls experience. This is just the xbox version with the work around to get it English, the PC press copies and PS4 JP versions are on 1.01 though.
He's on about them being very similar games to each, which in fairness they kind of are but there is clearly a lot more effort put into the souls games and at-least they changed the series up a bit by adding in influences from Bloodborne for Souls 3. The Souls/From Software games have only gone from strength to strength as well improving on the base game which CoD and AC did at the start of their cycles but after the 4th or 5th game the improvements stopped which may happen with the Souls...