That's the problem though as Hard isn't really "hard" anymore in most AAA games. Even The Last of Us brought out a Grounded mode to make the game harder for people as some people just find games incredibly easy.
Just look at CoD single players, Veteran difficulty has just gotten easier and easier to do as they removed the constant enemy re-spawns and the nade spam which used to be in WaW.
Then there's the opposite which the Souls games ...
people saying it can look that good don't seem to realise that they say it's going to be 60 fps... That is more than likely BS.
People stating that The Witcher 3, Ryse and Infamous all looked great yet they are running at 30 fps not 60...
The game may look like the trailer but I highly doubt it will be 60 fps and look like that.
We will have to wait and see if they can pull it off but at the moment it just sounds like PR BS..
why are people disagreeing with this?
Eh your not missing much anyway, very mediocre game that's really not worth playing.
yeah it was pretty obvious from launch day they had taken chunks out. People still play it though some how which is beyond me as i got bored within a few days due to terrible story and mission design...
To me Bungie were never that good as I never really thought Halo was anything special and Destiny is the same for me nothing special.
they won't because they are completely brain dead.
Hopefully this game has a Killer OST just like the last ones which we can listen to while exploring these planets.
Yeah. There is SP but not a campaign, it's equivalent to BF2 with the Bots taking over players while offline, which to me is much better than a tacked on awful Campaign.
why bother though if it's 4 hours long... Why not just spend more time on making the MP better. No point tacking on a terrible SP experience like they have done with Battlefield when no one plays it...
They didn't have campaigns either...
How do you know this? have you played it? No. So shut up.
This game isn't made for you then... Lol its made for people who play shooters and play Battlefield... The price is worth it for them and for me as I enjoy FPS games...
CoD4 had about 9 maps yet that game had massive replay value, no reason why DICE can't make Battlefront very re-playable through unlock systems or map variety.
They are aiming it at the Battlefield players as they know from people doing their surveys on Battlelog every month or so that 95% of people buy BF for the MP, why would they bother making a SP if they know this. If you even still play Bf you will see this every so often.
People wanting a good SP Star Wars game will have to wait for the other Star Wars games to arrive which will be built from the ground up to be a SP game.
Your a clearly an moron if you thought Battlefront was going to have a great single player experience... The old ones didnt so why would this one? DICE don't really do "Great SP" games, they do however do Great MP games which is what people wanted except for people on N4G who seem to want a terrible tacked on SP for Battlefront...
At the end of the day who buys a Big FPS game for the SP?...
They sold Homefront 2 a while a go.
Crytek are so stupid just leaving Timesplitters... Its a gold mine.
If that pew pew shooter is Timesplitters then i'm down as that game is a gold mine that they aren't doing anything with...
I think 1 was the best tbh, just loved the whole setting etc and it was NEW then so it was great to play. I love all the AC games except Unity which may of killed the franchise for me as it was such a step back in terms of gameplay and wasn't fun at all.
I know a lot of people who had seriously on Gears. I would of had it if didn't spend all my time in Player matches rather than ranked. Such a good game Gears 1 back in the day.
They better get rid of that clunky pile of sh*te combat that they gave us in Unity... Felt like a chore just fighting people, put it back to the old style or do something that actually works this time. The first AC game I haven't finished because of this.