This list wasnt for casuals. Sorry but if none of those games interest you at all, you cant be anything but casual. Or just a fanboy too clueless to see how bad you make yourself look by saying no to so many good games.
LOL its nice to see so many Sony owners wanting a game with limited graphics. I wonder how many of you I would find crying about the graphics just a few days ago when it was thought to be exclusive to Wii.However now thats it is on PSN poor graphics are ok..
What a complete tool. Not only was wagle NEVER mentioned but it's the SAME game on all 3 services
LOL way to show how clueless you are when it comesto FF.. 7 was started on N64 and moved to PS1. Please go get a real clue then come back and talk.
Nothing up there says it's coming to PS3.. MAybe they got smart and are releasing it on Wii. It's kinda obvious they are no longer catering to only Sony. Now if the fanboys would just let that sink on Oh and 1 last thing. Out of 12 FF games 6 were on NIntendo consoles 3 were on the PC and 2 were exclusive to Sony. FF7 is not one of those exclusives. Why SOny fans consider FF a Sony game when they had more games on Nintendo is beyond me.
Sad that PS3 only beat PS2 by 3k, and yet people willstill insist that MGS4 is a system seller even with proof like this staring them right in the face.
It's an 8 bit game. It will look the same on all of them. I would say the real question is which console owners will appreciate it more. With the amount of crying from 360/PS3 fans about graphics these days I dont see them flocking to an 8 bit Nintendo game
IF you want to talk about sales lets do it this way. SSBB sold to 25% of Wii owners.MGS4 was bought by 15% of PS3 owners. GTA4 was bought by 25% of PS3 owners. I fail to see how SSBB is your proof that Wii is nothing but casual gamers when it is at almost 7million sold. IF 7 million people buy a hardcore title its kinda obvious the console isnt owned by ONLY casual gamers. Sad that you pull up proof that you are wrong but have so much hate for Nintendo you cant even recognize it. Also that li...
Ive never met anyone so out of touch with reality.
Wii is owned by more than just casual gamers. Wii software sales prove this.
The only way to run that on PS2 would be to dumb it down and take a lot of that detail away. It could be done of course, the same way CoD4 could have been on Wii.
They are waiting until the game is finished before they decide who will publish. That way not matter who they chose, the company wont come in and screw the game up in any way.
It really isnt that hard to comprehend this. Using an Elephant in a game is not the exact same thing as copying the entire scene... How can anyone look at those screen shots and not see that they are almost exact copies of each other? It doesnt matter that they changed the story, that doesnt make it original. Thats like New line hiring new actors and making the first 3 Star wars movies over with a girl as the lead. Change the dialog some but use the exact same locations and camera shots.
You mean when some company in America BUYS the rights to show a certain program from Japan? No that is not at in any way the same.
I was confused by your post until I saw your name. Then of course it was obvious. A blind man couldnt see how similar those screen shots are to each other. So now I understand why you cannot see the obvious.
Give it time. Someone will try
Go look up your favorite game on Youtube, then tell me it also doesnt look like crap. Youtube videos are compressed, you shouldnt use it to judge a games graphics by. Even real life looks like crap on youtube.
Thats really more like Valve coming out with a new FPS that copies Halo's art style, and story, even down to the same cutscenes only they replace MC with the Soldier from TF2. A lot of the Art work looks the exact same, only animated.
I think we should all send an email to New Line with the link to this site. Let's hurry and get it shut down.
Yeah it did. You had 2 special moves on Nes. One was a flurry of punches and the other was a power shot.