He's playing Duke Nukem Forever
The King...of sales
Thats it Microsoft...thats all really
Your the "King" of something which has no revealnce to gamers whats so ever
Do you think Yusuf Mehdi went up to his Treehouse when he wrote this with his cup of milk and Oreos...
"WERE THE KING OF THE CASTLE...AND SONY'S THE DIRTY RASCAL"
@GametimeUK
You know I'm not saying Naughtydog didn't have the skills and just relied on luck but they were lucky with Uncharted 2s multiplayer
It dosen't matter how good the studio or multiplayer is sometimes a game that gets an online takes off...or it flops
Uncharted 2 is one of those games which got lucky
I'm NOT saying Naughtydog just relied on luck because it is amazing and is very well balanced ...
"DEAD SPACE 3"
Hell Yeah
"Dead Space 3 is expected to have two player co-op"
...
Oh crap
<sigh>
I think the focusing on core games and theb PS3 is better then focusing on a silly gimmick. Why do you think they didn't advertise it as much, they just created it because they knew motion control was popular and wanted something to compete against Kinect....basicaly Sonys attempt to take a chunk of Kinects audience.
It's not like they were relying on it to sell a crap ton...hell it's done pretty well without 500 million spent on advertising.
"The Awkward moment when you go to hit on a girl in Mercay Tavern and it turns out to be a bloke"
<Tingle Likes This>
Nope
It would be a silly thing to do
Co-op...Dead Space
<Sigh>
Drop in/out...I don't care this is notb the type of game for co-op. Expect action levels to rise, theres no possible way to make a scary co-op game. If DS had co-op then I wouldn't of found it scary, people focus more in talking to their friends then whats on the screen, it's like you dstract your self from getting that tense, scared feeling and if you don't feel like that then those "jumpy" moment...
You really think it's that easier to add co-op.....wow you don't really know anything about how programing works do you.
Look at Skyrim Bethesda even said they wouldn't do it because it would cause a lot of problems which would ruin the single player part of the game.
For once can we not let a single player game have a sequel without wanting co-op....something you yourself will probably go on for like a month then get bored and go on something...
It would be a waste of time when theres bigger things to be working on
Lets not forget they could turn around in the end if they did add it and say "Oh the reason theres not much life in the game is because we thought having your friend with you would satify you more"....obviously not worded like that but basicaly giving them an excuse not to work on the needed features of the game
Just Cause 3 would be great
If they can make the map even bigger then JC2 then I will be impressed. I mean having the LOST island in there where your plane actually blows up when you get near was just one of the great things hidden away in JC2...wonder if they would consider doing a FRINGE themed event in JC3.
The only thing they need to do is breathe some life into the map and focus on the gun mechanics. Hopefully it won't go over the top like what ...
"With all the great games to come out this generation, it’s no easy feat getting the number one spot on my list, but Mass Effect is so good that putting it at number one really wasn’t a difficult decision."
After how much Bioware have fallen and the fact that ME3 (especialy the ending) failed in terms of story telling compared to past ME games I don't think it would be easy for me to put it at Number 1...maybe if this was after ME2s release but not after playi...
Are you surprized...it's Rockstar, they always get given a free pass then some time later after it's sold well and reviews have been giving out people finaly admit the real flaws of the game. GTAV4, L.A Noire, Red Dead Redemption, MP3...some had more flaws then others, some like Red Dead hardly had any but if one thing gets a game marked down in another review then why should the same thing be ignored for Rockstar.
As mucn as I enjoyed the game, this dosen't fee...
A prequel should be kept for the PSV, as a spin off title
They're talented writters I'm sure they can bring Cole back some way
If they wern't planning to they wouldn't of bothered adding the question mark at the end.
What about if it's revealed only the strong conduits survived or someone was creating new man made conduits....anything is possible
Cole will return...they'll find a way. Cole is basicaly the face of the inFAMOUS franchise.
" I am not seeing others developers doing this."
My point exactly
The Wii U specs must be in nearly every developers hands by now, if Gearbox is telling the truth then other developers would be joining in with Gearboxes comments about how powerful it is.
So far it's just been Gearbox and as I've said I think it's only because they want the Wii U version of Aliens: Colonial Marines to sell well
I...
You know I will still wait for E3 before getting excited, to me this just seems more about Gearbox wanting Aliens: Colonial Marines to sell more on the Wii U, so it's the reason why I'm not going to take their word for it
I mean it's funny how it's mostly just Gearbox saying things like this about the Wii U.
Why didn't they just name it the Nintendo U then
Guess they really aren't changing the name...unless you can change the name of your page in FB, but I don't think you can do that...can you?
"Is Rockstar's latest a true follow-up to the Max Payne series"
Nope
Good game...great game in fact
But not something I would call a true sequel to Max Payne 3
Just seems like a new IP that was turned into MP3 early on in development, probably explaining the un fitting location and Max's out of character bald look. It's like instead of respecting the roots of MP, they structured the story around ...