I don't think I'm funny. I think I'm RIGHT.
The difference is, I don't give a crap about what anyone else thinks and isn't afraid to say what everyone is thinking.
I still don't know what crack they were smoking when they thought Green Day was a good idea. What's next? Linkin Park?
Grateful Dead is a small way of saying "sorry we effed up" I guess.
It has nothing to do with being a grammar nazi and everything to do with this moron not knowing how to write and still trying to pass himself off as a journalist.
HHG, YOURE NOT A JOURNALIST. YOU'RE A JOKE. UNTIL YOU LEARN HOW TO WRITE, HOW TO CHECK FACTS, HOW NOT TO ACT LIKE AN ARROGANT TWAT AND HOW TO NOT BE SUCH A BIASED FANBOY, YOU'LL ALWAYS BE NOTHING MORE THAN A SHILL WHO SONY PAYS TO PLAY UP TO THE ONE DEMOGRAPHIC (THE AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY) THAT THEY SO B...
Trying playing Beatles after chomping on shrooms. You'll go insane. Guaranteed.
Fun fact: money is worth less than it did ten years ago and yet games still cost the exact same amount.
A nintendo 64 cartridge in the 90's would have still cost you $50
Freedom Fighters had the commies invading us and winning. Clearly Eidos is un-American!
I like how Gaming Bolt essentially steals EDGE's hard work in order to get hits for their web site.
And no, saying you got the info from Edge's magazine doesn't change the fact that you're stealing revenue away from them by reposting the information on the Internet and profiting from it.
I have honestly never wanted to kill myself as badly as I did when I watched your painfully poorly written and produced video.
Hint for improvements: get someone who knows how to write a script to write one for you.
Because he's a shill for Sony, he speaks completely out of his ass, he has the literacy of a five year old, he's as big-headed and pretentious as they come and he makes up almost all his facts.
I won't approve this article because it's dumb as hell, but at least the writer seems cognizant of the fact that the list is about as pointlessly stupid as the games that are on it. It's self-reflective that way --it's dumb, shallow but somewhat entertaining writing --just like most of the games on the list.
Sigh. Another day, another generic fluff article by Gaming Bolt that ultimately has absolutely no significance other than to get hits. Seriously -- you guys just recycle the same premise for every article. I'm pretty sure you have a Best Graphics of 2010, Best PS3 graphics, best PS3 Graphics for 2010, and best PS3 graphics for 2011 also.
It gets pretty freaking old pretty freaking quick
It's no talent shill "journalism" at its very worst.
OK GUYS LETS CRITICIZE GAMES THAT WE HAVEN'T PLAYED BECAUSE THATLL GET HITS, RIGHT?
Your article sucks and your web site is pathetic. Get lost.
What a goddamn retarded article.
Anyone with two brain cells to rub together knows this. Stop acting like an elitist jerk off who's better than everyone else. Your web site is absolute garbage and you have no room to be calling out anyone.
Is a pointless article like this generic? Yes. Next question.
What does this article have to do with gaming? Nothing.
Terribly written list to boot.
Sorry, but I don't trust the opinion of any publication that didn't bother to do the necessary research to know that Warcraft is spelled "Warcraft" and not "WarCraft". That's StarCraft you're thinking of.
I'm legally blind so I can't get licensed to buy a gun or drive a car because the manufactures don't make provisions for people with handicaps.
Wow, that's CLEARLY discrimination.
What a stupid, pointless article.
What an awful web site. Seriously. You guys claim you're being sarcastic, but who gives a crap? You're terrible writers and you're not funny. GTFO.
Remember when journalists actually made news instead of stealing other people's and passing it off as their own in order to profit from it?
Yeah, me neither.