And that's fine. Maybe if you get a few million more people to agree with you then they'll do better in the future.
My point is simply that the good so monumentally outweighs the bad, that is why they get a "free pass". It's not really "free", they earn it with a history of awesomeness.
Haven't had any bugs or performance issues.
But even if I had, that wasn't what we were talking about here.
The whole "Bethesda free pass" argument is getting awfully tired.
People like their games.
Sometimes they have issues.
But people like them so much it isn't a big deal.
The way I look at it, if somebody like CD Project Red wants to get a "free pass", maybe they should make a better game to get people to look past the flaws.
Just fired it up on Xbox One and went to Corvega. Everything looks the same. Shadows are all there. Runs great, but I never had a problem before (running off external SSD).
I know this isn't what the haters want to hear, though, so just hit disagree and go on about your business talking about that piece of crap Witcher game.
Because of a couple shadows???
lol ok good luck with that.
I looked at the different layouts.
They are all terrible.
This is still just as terrible as the first beta.
The whole layout is just a big hot mess.
If this comes out as the only way to look at the site I'm gone the same day, it's horrible.
Walstreet there was no "bs psuedo nerd crap" in my comment.
He asked if the visuals were as good as what they showed at E3, the other guy said NO.
All I was trying to say is that no extra amount of pixels is going to change that answer to a yes.
This is an excellent guide on how to play the game like a choose your own adventure book where you mark the page you came from so you can go back if you don't like the results.
I will never understand why somebody would play a game this way, but to each his own I suppose.
Wallstreet it seems pretty obvious you have no idea what resolution means if you think that comment is accurate.
But what about playing a different character build?
Doing the other sides of the story choices?
Exploring and doing side missions you missed?
I can tell you from experience that if you were level 40 at the end there was a LOT of stuff you didn't do. I was 65 and missed a ton.
Not trying to argue with you or call you wrong, so don't take my comments the wrong way. I was just curious because if somebody asked me to na...
Admittedly, I'm not really on board with this remake to begin with, but I'd be FAR more concerned with the fact that they seem to be making it into an entirely different game than the original.
Where is the concern for that?
If this game has "little reason for a replay", then what game does, in your opinion?
I'm just curious because I can think of no game better suited for playing multiple times than a Fallout or Elder Scrolls game.
I've played this game an unhealthy amount of time since launch. Basically any time I'm not working or sleeping, and I had a couple extra days off and missed my share of sleep, too. lol
I finished it last night for the second time, and will be starting a 3rd character tonight.
I'm addicted.
I'll probably go back and play Fallout 3 after this playthrough. lol
Must be nice to get a refund.
I remember what that was like, about 20 years ago. lol
That would be true except this game had very few issues at launch.
It's easily one of the best games of the year and should be in discussion for GOTY.
No pity for criminals.
Well said, Fusion_Ninja.
I don't get the Fallout hate, and I equally don't get the Witcher love.
Witcher was so boring and repetitive. You start with every spell, and only gain a slight alternate version of each as you go along. It's like the combat never changes and you're still fighting the exact same fights after 100 hours. It's so terrible. It is easily the worst game I bought this year.
Fallout on the other hand...
Two words: Silver Shroud
Witcher's got nothing on the Silver Shroud.
Yeah I don't see the problem with it either.