I am certainly not sulking. I have realized a long time ago that Microsoft exclusives aren't worth all the fuss. When ever I play them I realize 80% of the games' so called "epicness" is just fanboy exaggeration and hype. I played Gears of War 2 and Mass Effect 2 without ever thinking "I wish this was on my system". But when i played UC2 all i could think was "I feel sorry for anyone who hasn't played this.". Don't get me wrong. The people who made ME2 and GEOW 2...
Add Splinter Cell Conviction to that list
No Microsoft never copies anything according to their fans.Did you know that they and Epic invented the third person shooter? That is a fanboy fun fact
Is it time to put down GOW 3 already? My watch must be slow.Any put downs for Splinter Cell yet? Not likely.
So by your tone and your obvious confidence I can assume you have already played the final version of the Natal and all the games it has to offer, therefore you already know that the Natal is better then the Move.Does your mommy know you are playing with her computer?
Thanks again for nothing Capcom. Still waiting for Dead is Rising on the PS3.
Gears of War making me cry? Gears of War made me want to mute the television to avoid the God awful dialogue.
Nintendo Ass saving Power.
Yes that's real sweet Microsoft. But tell me again how your magical system is supposed to recognize one player from another in the middle of a fast paced party game without a point of reference like the Move Wand? How will it keep up with scores and movement? Does it have a DNA scanner that knows who each of your friends are? Tell me Microsoft, do you ever say anything that isn't a lie or half-truth?
Even though I would like to see another R and C or Resistance game in the near future, a new title would be good too. I would like to see what they can do outside the main series they have now. But you know what would be epic? A crossover. Ratchet and Jak together, guns blazing. Add in Clank's and Daxter's wise cracks and sarcasm and both Insomniac's and Naughty Dog's sense of humour and you have a perfect, epic, action platformer
Insomniac, if you make a third Resistance game, give me back my vehicles and all my guns. You hear me. ALL of my guns at the same time. Cut the 2-4 guns BS that Halo and Gears have going please
Seeing that MSG4 has not only a good single player as well as a good multi-player unlike SCC, it's obvious that MSG4 is the winner.From what I saw of SCC, it is just another fanboy fueled game where everyone exaggerates it's epicness because it has a good multi-player. But let me ask you this, suppose I don't want co-op or multi-player and just want to play the game normally. I guess that's a screw you for me, huh Ubisoft.
IGN is really reaching for attention these days
When something is on the 360 everyone will make every excuse for it in the world. Uncharted 2 was a satisfyingly long games with a very robust mulitiplayer. But now here are the fanboys fighting for a 5 hour campaign on SCC. If Sony had made UC2 a 5 hour game,you same 360 owners would be here taking trash about how the the game shouldn't be GOTY because it is too short. No one can ever see the s**t on their own side of the fence.
I never understand how a game that has a 3-5 hour campaign could still get high scores. In my book that is an automatic 8 at best. But everyone always argues that it has a rich multiplayer experience.If that is all they care about, then why doesn't the company make a multiplayer game only? Because then they wouldn't be able to justify the $60.00 price tag. Uncharted 2 gave us the best of both worlds, so why couldn't you Ubisoft?
Still not a believer.There are still so many unanswered questions about the Natal that Microsoft seems to be skillfully avoiding. I still think that despite Microsoft's usual hype and over enthusiasm, that the Natal will be less then Microsoft claims it to be and even if it works as half as good as they say, they still have to contend with Move owners, Wii owners and Natal haters and unbelievers. That chops the market for it almost in half.
I don't think that people want it to fail anymore then I think people want the Move to fail. But it's just that many of us know how Microsoft works and know very well the the kind of hype they generate and how not close the final product is compared to the hype. Everyone is already crowning Natal the winner before they have showed any games or seen it under gaming conditions or even before certain questions about the Natal that are being neatly avoided by Microsoft. Microsoft's way of busines...
In a sane world these type of games should not be struggling to make more then a million. Ratchet is one of, if not one of the few, good action platformers. It's colourful, vibtant, plays smoothly and has great animation and voice acting as well as intresting, fun gameplay. And yet it still falls below the million mark at this point. And don't tell me it's because it's gameplay is the same old thing excuse like everyone keeps saying. If that was an excuse for not buying a game then Halo, Gear...
Microsoft has begun the hype machine once again with everyone claiming that it is the greatest with almost no proof, no software or answers to questions about the obvious limits or uses of the Natal. Sony as so far proven that the Move can do several things with more to come. I refuse to listen to Microsoft's hype which always falls flat on it's face with the product being not even close to how epic everyone claims it is. Actual proof Microsoft. Not tech demos,not claims from far away countri...
The question that should be asked is, did it need to be changed at all? From what i have seen of the game is that they have basically changed it into Uncharted 2. The guy even looks like an older Nathan Drake. Developers these days are just changing games to say that they changed it. No one thinks about balance, coherent story lines, inconsistent gameplay or even removing challenges or game modes that many people liked except for the whiny people who complain about everything. My point is don...