Woow, the venom and trolling towards GT5 is absolutely out of control. NO other game would get this much shit, and the irony is PD never hyped this game in the slightest and don't deserve this unfair smear campaign, they simply kept to themselves and made an incredible game. The gaming media, if you could even call it that, were the ones who hyped the shit out of it in order to gain hits, and now they bash them for not living up to an impossible standard. It's a fucking video game, a...
Since when have review scores meant anything. They're about as in touch with what gamers want as 'Squeenix'. There is no integrity in gaming journalism, they're bought too easily, and too often, I imagine because how little money is in it otherwise, and when they aren't bought, they make their money by writing flamebait reviews so as to rack up hits. They're desperate whores.... Which is weird, cause in any other context, I love desperate whores. Anyway, my point is, ...
@Bereaver
"It's because they are judging it for what it isn't instead of what it is. They said 10/10 for simulation. THAT IS WHAT IT IS! "
Precisely. You hit the nail on the head.
This happens every time without fail. The point is not that 86 is a bad score for any given game, it's that it's a remarkably low score for THIS particular game, in comparison to higher scores given to obviously less deserving games.
"EVERY game can't be a 95.." What are you talking about? What does that even mean? We're not talking about any game but this one, and it's one of the biggest, most stunning games in video gaming history from one of ...
Actually I'm pretty sure the standard cars do have a cockpit view, they just don't have the same detailed realistic interiors that premium cars do, I'm pretty sure that was cleared up a while back.
I think it's a little early for a poster, but who knows... Generally movie posters aren't made before a script at least is done and some of the film has been shot, but who knows, maybe they've just been keeping production under tight wraps.
Yeah Donnie Wahlberg was in BoB, not Mark.
But to be fair I think everyone's giving Mark a bad rap. Maybe he'd be a good Drake, maybe not, but he's not to blame for Max Payne being a shit movie. You guys have your focus in the wrong place, it's less important to have an actor that looks and sounds as close to ND as possible, than it is to have a solid screenplay and a great director. Two elements Max Payne did not have.
It's probably more ...
RDR is next on my list, too many games too little money.
buddy, you seem to be a little bitter about 3d...
A rip off for who? It's for people who want 3d, and that's what they get... You don't make sense, you're just lashing out at technology. 3D has a proven market pal, the TVs are just the next step, if you don't want one don't get one, but there is a market for it, and actually plenty of us do buy TVs more often than every 10 years, and would like to enjoy the latest tech.
"That was ...
Uhh, actually dude, those "bullshots" are exactly what the game looks like. Either you've never played it, you have a crap TV, or you are just another fanboy looking for attention.... Or all of the above.
I do find it funny though how you posted those screens and then you were all like: "like I said... bullshots" as if to say, the screens looked so good, they must be bullshots! When in reality, you just payed U2 a compliment, cause it actually does lo...
lay off the paint chips bra. Facts are facts.
Actually it was only really the 360 fanboys saying shît like: this game has the best graphics in videogame history etc.. The majority of us knew better though.
This is one of the best looking games out there, and has some of the best mocap, so if of coarse every game has certain limitations due to time and money, why point that obvious fact out at all, you could say that about any game past present or future. It just seemed like he was looking for anything negative to add in there, is there any game that would look good enough for him to not point out that it could have been better with more time and money?
I couldn't care less regardle...
why didn't he just read all the origami clues at once and see what he had to do, and skip to the end? How did he coincidentally open the origami clues in the right order?
You wouldn't literally need to turn your head all the way around, just like a mouse only requires you to move it a bit to the right to turn your character all the way around your head would only need to look to the right or left of the screen to turn the camera, the more you turn your head the faster the camera turns.
One of the greatest games I've ever played. I'm playing it on hard right now and I'm already well over 8 hours. The game's a fückin masterpiece.
Last chance SE, blow us away!
PS. KEEP IT EXCLUSIVE!!!
It's only a bigger step forward if you subscribe to the idea that the future of gaming is controller-less. Personally, I'd rather hold something, than pretend I'm holding something. But then again, I'm one of those people that doesn't much care for motion controllers in general. But the Move is more my taste between the two, as I think Natal is more gimmiky than practical/useful.
They should go buy a standalone player, it's called a PS3. Although you might find yourself playing more games than watching movies.
@oohWii
"If I'm wrong I really don't have a problem with being corrected. Unlike some of you know-it-alls. "
You call them know it alls when you were the one that was inaccurately correcting someone. What you said was nonsense.
"But I will say this, I can gaurantee you that GT5 is not 100% accurately showing this arrempt the way it would be in real life. "
Get a life you troll, the game is far more...