Why are you on this website spouting your drivel, instead of taking your own advice and responding to people who comment on this article that you have no interest in?
By the way, last time I checked the PS3 has a pretty large library full of "actual" games as well. But seeing as you are either lying about having both systems, or that you wasted your money on a system you rarely play and don't care about, why should we take your comments as anything BUT nonsense?
Talk about completely arbitrary and off-topic! JackWho is the only one who's insecure around here to be posting such off-topic nonsense like that. What does a tired, old series that comes out every single year have to do with one of the most anticipated games of this generation?
I have said LONG ago that I really dislike the concentration on so much multiplayer this generation. It seems that gamers are fine with the developers copping out and delivering a 4-6 hour single player experience if they get muliplayer, no matter how good the multiplayer aspect of the game really is. In fact, many games that incorporate multiplayer aren't any better than the single player experience, but because the developers simply tacked on a multiplayer aspect to the game it's okay to gi...
It's sad how many people think every single game needs multiplayer, even when it wouldn't match the game at all.
Like my post states below, I swear that there are more people here who actually care more about console sales then playing the games that they all brag about.
You're willing to behead each other for supporting the other system... grow the hell up.
Simple as that.
You honestly think that it will run away (sales-wise) with all the other awesome games coming out this holiday season?
I thought this was supposed to have come out last week. Still nothing!
I love that game!
You could build up your rage the fastest when using the flame thrower
Kudos to the developers for being smart about copy protection.
And both of those games are arcade racers. GT:5 is a simulation racer, so if you wanted to compare games, you should have listed Forza instead.
Reported as SPAM
Butthurt over my statements, you decide to twist the subject of my post that you have decided to reply to, all to make yourself feel better.
Your attempt = fail
On the right-hand side of the page, sometimes there is an XBOX 360 advertisement that comes up, mentioning the price drop to 199. The funny thing is, if you look further down into the advertisement, you will see the disclaimer that
*Prices may vary
Now, if you truly believed in your price drop, and you believed in your value to your consumers, would you really make statements of that nature in your own advertising? The fact is, even MS knows that their price drop is ...
Your ill-informed statement is gravely mistaken. The PC most certainly can pull off some of the most technically-advanced features known to man when it pertains to videogames, but at a cost that many are sure to set aside for their own agenda. Does your (ill)logic even begin to consider the fact that you need a monster rig to fully tame Crytek's wildly unoptimized Crysis engine? When consoles are so much easier to utilize, and that plug-and-play is simply "that" with consoles, many ...
Everyone knows that exclusive titles are the true demonstration of a console's potential, and Sucker Punch are talented enough developers to prove that theory.
Deny it all you want, but Sony has some of the best first-party development studios out of any of the big 3 console makers.
It's good to see Battles on that list, however! I loved the song "Tonto" in that last LBP trailer "Sackboy in love".
What the hell is there to disagree with in my first statement? Colony Wars started on the PSX, and was one of the bigger sci-fi shooter "franchises" on the system, developed by one of the bigger names in development at that time (Psygnosis). Most people who haven't heard of Colony Wars haven't been gaming with the Playstation brand long enough to recognize that fact, or they have been out of the loop when it comes to famous franchises.
Where's the validity in your argument in terms of pertaining to this article (price at MSRP)? The base PS3 is 399, and since you don't care about extraneous options, BC shouldn't be a problem. The base 360 is 199 and doesn't even come with a HDD or any features built into the PS3 upon purchase. Anyone who uses XBOX LIVE Arcade can attest to the fact that MS should have included a hard drive in every sku from the very beginning, due to the amount of room downloaded games take up. The problem h...
"I didn't ask you what it meant my point was: A fanatical PS3 supporter comforts himself with the wording chosen by this media outlet. lol"
Oh the irony, considering you're a fanatical 360 supporter. But it's okay, because in your eyes you're always right, eh?
BTW, I see you finally decided to post evidence in your avatar of the moneyhats Microsoft is sending your way for defending your console so valiantly on a meaningless website. Congrats!