games shouldn't be 20 hours long just because you want it too. The developers had a vision, and they realized what they wanted to with Vito. Plus it's only $10 for a game that is 10, which is enough.
thought gears 2 suffered from horrible lag. I with a 15/2mb connection would get the laggiest games. Also the grenade spamming was annoying and not fun, especially with the smoke grenades.
Once you've used ventrillo or mumblez for a while, the xbox live party and game voices sound weird. It makes it very easy to mistake guys for girls and the opposite
what a steal
Am I shallow enough to buy a game for $20 just to get a new hat and items for my soldiers...Yes
It's almost a guarantee this game is going to sell like hotcakes now. Ea's PR team couldn't have done any better than this.
They don't take note of the great achievements in games. If they looked at games like Oblivion, Fallout 3, Mass Effect 1 & 2 and The Witcher they could learn things. Such as Less cut scenes or less boring cg
same here, I really don't get what all the fuss is all about; It's EA, of course it was coming to ps3. All you guys need now is l4d. Which regardless about how you feel about Valve and it's past with the PS3 you should still pick it up.
too bad most people won't read this because it isn't less than a paragraph.
If he wants to see no future, maybe he should go to TGS
They just make your fps's sink from 60 to 25 to 30. Not much of a difference at least for me, I had physx on and turned it off after 5 mins.
this is only physical copies, right? I mean if the split is 50% online and 50% retail; then it sold about 1.4 mill in the month of July. Either way good job blizzard, now if you could make a fps, i would be happy,
This is the demo mixed in with a bunch of clips released by 2K. So basically this is a review based on the demo...Who ever made this video review has a career at Gamespot or Gameinformer
this game is going to fail, i just got a feeling, that lost planet 2 feeling
This article is flawed in a way because steam doesn't show sales figures, revenue or how steam sales account for the growth and profit of a game. Show me these numbers and you can start to get a real picture of the pc market.
you don't need top of the line hardware to play games, a 5770 which is only 150 can run mafia 2 max @60 fps. While the console versions are running about 25 fps on low with no aa. that 5770 can run crysis, BFBC2, and any game coming out this or next year. And 2 to 3 years down the line, if you have to start playing games on medium settings, they will still look better at medium than their console counter parts. So saying that you have to get the most expensive top of the line hardware...
if that were true Bioshock, Half life series, portal and l4d series wouldn't be the critical and financial success they are.
I would rather have developers try not to use them, although Uncharted 2 and Mass Effect 2 are the games where im not tempted to skip them
a mac book could play starcraft 2, and those are 1000, so your "friend" spending 1900 just to be able play sc2 is a lie. I spent less than 1500 to build a i7 920 W/ 4 gigs of ram and 2 5870's, this machine will last me about a decade. once again people talking about things they don't know about, then again this is n4g...in fact the blog wasn't even about how much he spent on his pc, rather it was about the trials he went through, yet you still some how come to this con...
I'm sorry for wanting games that don't take 20 hours to beat. Maybe i have other things to do besides doing the same missions over and over just to make it longer