"You show a screen of his back side" I don't get what's so funny about showing a screen of his back side. Please enlighten us
Yes the PC version will always look better, but MS will end up getting your money regardless of what you get it on.
Here's your proof: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/...
And once again I will tell you that there's no 1 year gap between the consoles. The people that were going to buy a PS3 already purchased one just like 360 and Wii. The consoles have been known about for the same amount of time which means 360 is outperforming it. The whole 1 year thing is just an illusion made up by fanboys.
Edit pansbaer: Don'...
Yeah but PS3 isn't making any profit per console like the 360 is, and on top of that 360 makes it up in software and services as well. All around 360 is making money one way or another and what Sony is doing is sticking to a higher price hoping parts prices will fall. They are in a bad position but whenever there able to make money on it things will change. It's silly to question MS's selling tactics when it's a lot more thought out then Sony's and smarter.
The Playstation brand will be fine just like 360 so don't let this doom and gloom news bring you down.
Well since the PS3 was suppose to launch originally when the 360 did why don't you do a better comparison. There is no 1 year gap excuse people. PS3 should of caught up almost immediately but due to price and services has been failing. The whole one year gap thing is nothing more than a excuse to make up time.
Xbox 360 sold 26.49M
26.49/3years = 8.83 million consoles a year
PS3 sold 18.82M
18.82/3years = 6.27 million consoles a year sold
...
Because they didn't come out and say the next generation starts when we say it does and make all kinds of c0cky claims.
D@mn sure not LBP. lol
Well everybody has there right to an opinion I guess which makes things interesting. Personally I don't think LBP should win game of the year, but to each there own.
That's your opinion and is not at all factual. Sure they might not have leader boards but what the game does well in co-op from both sides is masterful. You can doubt it all you want but the co-op game play rivals any of the games you mentioned. Calling the game repetitive just shows as well how crazy you are, because this is one of those games you are going to spend 5 hours on a very long level playing it different every time. Heck you mean to tell me all the great reviews that popped up we...
Well I'm still loving it more then any other game this year. Tons of replay value and it never seems to get old. It maybe different for you but I'm truly loving this master piece.
True but I was just trying to understand why he posted that. I sure would love to see a list of total xbox and ps3 exclusives though. Both consoles put out a lot of stuff and I'm not seeing the PS3 edge in numbers. PS3 definitely announced more games but I don't think they release more. 2009 seems to be a different story but MS has yet to announce it's lineup.
How can one be a fanboy idiot when you just said yourself it was prefernce. I like the 360 controller better because my hands are big so how does my choice make me an idiot lol? It's better for me and just is so leave it at that.
Edit below: It doesn't mean it's better for everybody no, but it can mean it's better for the indivual. I see were your coming from but there's nothing wrong with liking one more than the other and considering it better.
Yeah and it's even funnier that you don't get it. Anyone that agrees with this guy is stupid in my book if that makes you feel better. Sonyowns is nothing more then a tool nuff said.
Fear has much better gameplay then KZ so as long as they can get the visuals correct were in for a treat.
Edit below: I've played KZ and I've played fear which destroys KZ gameplay wise. Part two is the exact same game with a fresh coat of paint so there no need to prove what I've played. Just keep the bragging up like PS3 fanboys normally do before any release.
1ST off there's been much more footage of Alan Wake then Uncharted and GOW3 combined. Your just the typical fanboy assuming you know that those games are AAA. 2nd I can't wait for 2010 so i can hear the same this will be the year of Sony crap. At this rate PS3 will never catch 360 in overall software sales for a console which is sad since it apparently had better exclusives.
And how in the heck does PS3 get quality games when the average review scores say different. MS is a software company so obviously there games are going to have better quality especially if you stop and look at multi plats. Is it me or is there always something Sony fans try and claim like it's the truth.
You guys act as if PS3 is the this future proof console that in 5 years from now will be realized. Well it isn't and anything the PS3 can do can be done on 360 minus a bluray player. People don't have money right now so there much better off upgrading there 360. If the average Joe finds out that 360 can do everything PS3 can for less then there going with 360. Heck they've been doing patch work on PS3 to get it services up to par with 360 since launch and still haven't gotten there so how are...
We already know that so what's your point? 360 has been outselling PS3 in software this entire gen and we know that as well. Now I personally don't think the recession is going to hurt PS3 in sales and honestly think it's going to help it. There's to much doom and gloom going on by the media like it's all over when the truth is recovery is right around the corner.
Yes the 360 can produce better graphically rich looking exclusives if made to the systems strengths. Now the same could go for PS3 but looking at 360 versions and titles it's easy to see that it's more capable.