Good. The show was terrible.
Could have: should have.
I'll leave the 'would have' out of the equation, being that it is WB.
So Nintendo should be criticized, alongside Sony. Nintendo doing it is wrong. That does't make it fair that Sony is following their actions.
I think it's ridiculous that we have "remakes" of even the latest of Naughtydog releases, yet we can't get a single new IP since two generations ago.
Gamers have been told that things like microtransactions are there to keep the price of games down, yet all we see is developers, more and more, developing these games around egregious microtransactions, yet still raising the price of games.
I get it in free-to-play. I don't understand why more and more "AAA" games are acting like app store releases.
Who the hell would want to play this one a phone in the first place?
I guess a whole two-thousand people.
Graphics on the PC scale with you. It doesn't take much more money to make a PC that outperforms the SeriesX/PS5.
The difference is PC has full backwards compatibility. So when new hardware comes out, alongside the new consoles, PC gamers are just cranking the settings and adding mods, and console only players sit, begging to pay full price for a remaster.
It's why I can play a modded Morrowind that looks better than stock Skyrim, while console only player...
Going to be real here; this looks like crap.
It doesn't. Not that this is all that demanding a game as is. The graphics are pretty low end.
Cyberpunk, Fallout 76 and No Man's Sky always come to mind.
Just a bunch of people he surrounded himself with. At least that's what they're going with at the moment.
Great game, but the second was better. Especially on PC where you can use the unofficial patch that adds a lot of the content the didn't get to finish before release.
I barely play anything online. The Gamepass for console was ideal for me. I didn't need online, or any of the extra deals. We all knew higher pricing was coming; true of basically any service, but it's still lame when it finally happens.
Up front. Factor in paying more for games, add in needing to pay for online. By the end of the generation you paid more for your console than a better PC, without any of the luxuries that a PC offers. I mean, you get the box upfront for cheaper. Sure.
I guess that's how they thank the consumers.
If Lawbreakers went free-to-play right out of the gate I think it would have fared better, honestly.
Just grabbed the original on a deep sale.
There is nothing in the article that says anything about the Series S being the problem. If the base game runs just fine on the Series S, there's no reason to believe this patch somehow would tank the game's performance.
Welp, if that's the case let's see what happens. Thought the team did well with Halo 4 and Infinite (campaign).
It's a pretty generic game all around.
How about Naughty Dog actually put out a new game.