I have said plenty of times said I was looking forward to reach and Gears 3. I still am looking forward to gears 3.
Am I supposed to like reach when I do not?. Check my gamerscore for it. 965 points with over 24 hours of mp. Im sick of halo now. It took 24 hours of mp to realize this.
“…we have found that it’s usually harder for us to get things working fast on the PS3. It’s a really powerful piece of kit but it’s a little more complex to work with than the 360. So maybe there is slightly more work being done on the PS3 as we can be pretty sure that if we get it working at a decent FPS on PS3 then it’s going to work on 360 too.”
Dont take things the wrong way guys.
Keywords: Powerful, Complex.
of the same sauce over and over again. I know I am.
more power to you if you do. But I beat it played over 24 hours of the mp and I am done with it. It is just too similar to halo 3. It is safe to say that I am now officially sick of halo.
How? It was so bland boring and clunky.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
This looks nuts. Look at everything happening on screen. look at the weather, the explosions, the sound. This is why I laugh at people that say reach looks better. You can only like the art style better in reach not the actual tech.
Your wrong... let me explain why.
All the 6 spus on ps3 run at 3.2ghz.
The 360 has 3 cores that run at 3.2ghz. when the the 360 has 2 threads per core each thread would not run at 3.2ghz. It would be half that so 1.6 ghz per thread on 360 and 3.2ghz per thread on ps3.
Reach has bigger environments but also is really short and has alot of backtracking. Also their is alot less going on in reaches environments. I just beat reach I know what Im talking about.
comes with a 20 dollar promotion too.
Not the tech better. Only the art can be a opinion. Not the number of polygons.
So sick of you fanboys. When it comes to this subject I truly believe that you are blinded by your wishful thinking when the truth is as clear as day.
Gamertag talltony I am really dissapointed in reach.
A story about space marines in halo isn't generic while kz2 is.
That the majority of multiplats are better on 360 but I do have a problem with those ignorant people on this site implying that it's because the ps3 is graphically weaker console. Their are many reasons for a poor ps3 multiplat but that is not one of them.
Why don't 360 exclusives look better than the majority of ps3 exclusives then? Why are the best looking console games on ps3 and not on 360? Surely 1st party vs. 1st party is a fair fight right. That's the best a console can do vs. The best a console can do.
Multiplat differences come down to how much time a dev wants to spend putting things into jobs on ps3's spu's. How many times do we have go through this argument? They are different architectures but when ...
looking forward to my raven.
annoying... One headshot kill and all the spartans just hide up in a corner or away from the zombies so they can easily kill one at a time.
Hate infection and it's almost picked every game!
.
way to own him roonie.