well you can't blame them for accepting the money. It is what the business runs on. In both examples what you are saying is like that of the little guy being guilty even though the big man pulls the strings.
well microsoft paid $50m for the exclusive DLC, something that would have been in the full game on both consoles if it wasn't held back by dvd limitations. As for next MGS, it is obvious microsoft showed the cash since they did it with just about every former ps3 exclusive. I should have said at the expense of ps3 gamers though since xbox only owners get to enjoy some great games so it's not at the expense of all gamers, just those who want to experience the most out of games.
I wish it was ps3 exclusive also on the bases of the belief that dvd limitations held back what could be done with gta4 hence the two expansions packs seen on 360. I've nothing against the 360, I just love gta and want it to be made to its full potential. I also wish the next MGS game was ps3 exclusive... it's kind of annoying how microsoft slaps these developers across the face with their money at the expense of us gamers.
I remember a burnout video a while back demonstrating natal. It looked ridiculous and the people playing were unable to control their car it was that bad. Apparently though it can trace objects so you can use your dinner plate as a steering wheel... yay! :/
excuse my ignorance but how does the degree system work? Is it clicks to the website or just clicks into the article? The low degrees suggests to me that it is clicks to the website because the video is already embedded on this page.
greywulf - If the mods decide which news gets hot then doesn't it mean they are deliberately exacerbating this stupid fanboy war? It's always the flamebait biased articles that reach high degrees...
now, doesn't actually holding a steering wheel and using pedals look more fun than pretending to do so like with natal. It feels like you are actually driving not just moving your hands around in mid-air like an idiot.
I recommend L4D2 on PC, it plays better and the online is free. If you want a xbox you need to be into forza3, halo3 or gears2 otherwise all you need is PC/ps3.
shame all the comments of people hating on this game instead of enjoying its quality. Not many gamers around n4g these days.
I feel sorry for the people who never played the ps1 and ps2. Some of the best games ever made have been on these consoles.
people over-react on these stupid comparisons. 360 fanboys pretend that the 1 blurry pixel on the ps3 renders the game obsolete and ps3 fanboys cry on about exclusives. The truth is when you're playing the game these differences are totally unnoticeable. Only if one version has a obvious inferior framerate then we should talk about it, but these screenshots are completely pointless.
I bet if the ps3 version was noticeably superior you'd be all over this game. Stop being such an ass about it.
There's virtually no difference. just the usual ps3 looking slightly lighter and slightly more blurry which is something that you don't notice in game anyway.
the guy doesn't own a ps3 so obviously he's gonna miss out some top exclusives which is probably unintentional. he keeps referring to ps3 gamers as "those guys" lol. I dunno how gamers could get by without a ps3 these days.
8/10 and an overall positive review is good enough for me because I know I'll like this sort of game. Sad how an 8/10 these days might turn some people off a game they could really enjoy.
the more people see it the more people will be conditioned to FF therefore more sales. You could say the same about Halo in the US but the fact is adverts get you more sales.
still unsure whether to go PC or ps3 for this one, can't make my mind up from a few screenshots. I need to do some research...
great to see pes4 on that list. Another classic footy game along with cm01/02.
Sony's new tactic of attracting xbox live gamers to psn :)
"Just like alcohol is a "scapegoat" when a drunk driver kills someone?"
he was smoking weed the previous afternoon. He fell asleep at 6.30am the next morning. That's over 12hours since he had a smoke. He wasn't high. I should have worded it clearer in my first comment.
"The fact of the matter is if they are high they are impaired. I wonder why we (not everyone) don't consider weed as impairing as alcohol."
Because it i...
@george sears
they seem to having no problems passing up 5m sales for Agent
@elven6
fair point, but did you not get the feeling while playing it that something was missing? that it wasn't quite complete? content was dropped as a result of the dvd limitations.