NGP is going to be cheaper then this. High end phones cost maybe 200$ to produce but are always sold for a much higher price. Sony is not going to sell NGP for anything higher then the production cost if they want to win the market. I expect 299$ for wifi only model.
Gamingbolt sucks, dont give them hits.
So next gen is strictly about the amount of players? I guess MAG is a next gen game then. Besides Battlefield will have 64 player online on PC.
Klado, you have no idea what you are talking about and you pretend what you are saying are facts. Its not facts, its what you think is true and its really not. Im not saying your completely wrong with the message you are trying to convey, but you are definately overestimating the NGPs power compared to the PS3
How many Ghz or Mhz the processor or gpu is running at does not tell you how powerfull it is so the comparison you did is pretty much useless except for the RAM which does hint that NGP might be able to have as good or better textures then PS3.
However it has been said that the NGP is really strong at doing shaders and that it can do any shader the PS3 can do. I can believe that since it has 8x the shader performance of the Samsung galaxy S and 16x the shader performance of a...
No they are not a far better solution because if they were we would only be using those. They do get a better result but at a far greater cost, so unless you have the hardware to use alot of MSAA then MLAA is a better solution. If you do have the hardware for it (can run 8xMSAA or more with atleast 60fps) then it is a better solution.
When an object gets further away from the screen the engine will render less polygons. 3x the drawdistance does not equal 3x more polygons. I see thats the point you are trying to make but you are wrong.
Whats the point of the 3DS if your not gonna play the games in 3D?...
NGP is much more improved over the original PSP then 3DS is over the normal DS. 3DS only adds more power and 3D. With the NGP we finally get dual stick controls which is going to matter alot, and we also get touch screen and touchpad on the back which means that while the original PSP was really lacking in the control department the NGP has almost limitless opportunities for how games can be controlled.
Animations looked horrible and although much if not all of that trailer was prerendered it looked horrible. I knew this trailer was not going to be stunning, but calling this crap stunning is ridiculous
Actually the PSP2 is going to have 1gb of RAM which is twice as much as both the PS3 and Xbox 360. I havent heard anyone say its going to be more powerfull then the PS3 so i dont think they are refering to just the RAM. PSP was close to PS2 level quality. Not quite there but very close. If PSP2 can come as close to the PS3 as PSP came to the PS2 then id say this statement is valid. And i dont see why not.
PS2 Launch: 2000 - PSP Launch: 2005 (5 years later) Almost PS2 level gr...
If you mean as in "just as powerfull", then yeah you're right. But i think the main point is that when playing the games they're gonna look like games for PS3/360. Screen resolution will probably be lower so i believe its possible.
probably, but sony is definately gonna put in a bigger battery then what Nintendo did. Id like to have eternal battery on my devices but im not to worried about it. I dont mind playing while connected to the wall, im just happy i can bring my gaming device with me when we go on vacation. 3 hours is usually enough for any gaming session you'd have on a portable. You just have to remember to plug it in afterwards
Im sure there is some middleware engine they could use to spead up that process. Im guessing UE3 is already running on the PSP2.
But the positive thing if it really is as powerfull as they say is that all the games made for PS3 and Xbox360 can essentially be made for the PSP2 aswell, so it might end up getting alot of support
Nice, but why is page 49 missing? Kind of annoying that its not there, messes up my reading.
Red Dead had really good graphics. So far LA noire looks to be the same or a little worse, but they have some kick ass facial animation technology
I hope you buy 10 copies and burn them, because then you will earn naughty dog a profit
If you think Kotick has anything to do with Activision making money then you are horribly wrong. There are two reasons for activision's success. Infinity Ward and Blizzard, and kotick has nothing to do with it.
He is treating the people responsible for most of Activision's success, the people who used to work for Infinity Ward, like shit. Now he is desperately trying to talk up Treyarch and make it sound like they are the skilled CoD developer. Truth is Treyarch game...
You cant blame Pacther though for people posting articles about every damn comment he makes. Thats the main reason people hate him too. Every time he says something someone will post an article about it on N4G and people will cry out for him to shut up. Its not his fault that random bloggers decide to cover every word coming out of his mouth.
That planecrash wont be in the game you say? Oh how wrong you are. That plane is going to crash during gameplay. Im sure of it.
Knowing their biggest audience is on consoles? A game might or might not sell better on consoles much dependent on what type of game it is and if its constructed for console and ported to PC or as in Battlefield 3's case, constructed for the PC and ported to the consoles. There is nothing wrong at all with showing the PC version of your product unless you pretend its the console version.
And i really hope you are not trying to take a stab at Battlefield 3 for showing the...