well how come G$ isnt showing it on tv like they do every year? and there is no info about it on the playstation blog.
wait the tokyo game show is already going on?
why isn't this on G4 or on the playstation blog?
alright and that is your opinion.
oh yeah i almost wish it were still like that. :D
im glad they aren't showing any of the last guardian.
makes the time go by faster by getting closer to them being finished and me not knowing when that is. the game will be out before i know it with this attitude.
it pisses me off how they turned a great console game into a handheld. i don't understand why they wouldn't make this for the wii. that would make me buy a wii just for that game.
why can't somebody say a TPS looks better than a FPS? because its a different genre there are different standards to graphics? I'm not disagreeing with anybody here. i am just simply trying to understand why it has to be in the same genre to compare a game graphically.
id rather have 4-7 well created maps, instead of 12-15 maps that they didn't put much work into. still no reason to charge 15 dollars for 4-5 maps when you see the competition tossing everyone new maps like free candy. the only maps that either bad company game charged for is vietnam for bad company 2.
@tachyon
then rachet and clank should only be 7 games then because 3 of those are variants for the main games.
and for battlefield it sho...
rachet and clank has brought something new to the table each year they had released a game. same goes to battlefield.
call of duty stopped bringing new things to the table once cod 4 came out.
and it definitely has been more than 8 games in 9 years for call of duty
Call of duty: finest hour
Call of duty 2: Big red one
Call of duty: roads to victory
Call of duty: World at war: final fronts (ps...
i wish everybody acted like this with every other article that shows up 50 afferent times on here but see this article come up maybe 10 times and its getting old? i guess if it is about something benefiting the pc version, nobody cares. i bet if this mod was on consoles, that everybody would be all over it.
no need for 1000. more like 6-7 hundred :P
Already beat you to it. just got my rig in the mail a few days ago. so excited for the beta to see how my rig plays it. knowing how my gpu runs crisis 2 in Dx11 ill probably have to stick with DX 10 till i get a second GPU.
i dont understand how your one game saves bug that you have makes the game have so many technical problems. the only issue i ran into with this game is the wrong copy they put out on steam. haven't had any bugs. granted the respawns need to get fixed. other than that. this game is great. are you on the console or something?
im glad this game is being as successful as it deserves to be.
i love how they show the picture as a sims 3 error
you won't even see the difference. quit bashing the devs
Crysis 2, GTA 4, Team fortress 2... actually just the whole orange box. left 4 dead and L4D 2, and soon to be Battlefield 3.... there is probably more that i don't own. there, i named some. and this doesn't make me a pc elite. i just wanted to answer your question.
my build will be here tomorrow morning!!! i have a radeon hd 6850 and a AMD phenom 2 X4 3.4 ghz quad core. if i add another gpu i will definitely be able to max it out, but i won't do that till next year.
i dont understand what they mean by after 100 play throughs you can level the battlefield.
i don't see the problem with this. betas are mostly to find the little bugs here and there that are very frequent and also to test the server load so they don't have as much server issues at launch. and its not EA's choice. its DICE's choice to do this. be glad that we are even getting a beta