you may have some valid points, but you lose readers with your doucheness. Real next gen gaming will come in the form of the 'Oculus Rift." (ski goggle sized VR) only a year or two away, but insanely cool
ugh, not this again. COD is it's own beast and will always outsell Battlefield. I wish it wasn't true but it is. Why? Because its an accessible fast paced, arcade-like shooter. Every 13yr old's playground. I've tried to convert all of my friends list to BF3, but only a couple took. COD is more appealing to the casual gamer, and its reputation will sell millions alone, because people know what they're buying. Battlefield is trying to get INTO that market, so it's more o...
translation.... "wah wah wah wah, i'm gonna go play halo" Could you sound any more like a tool? GO sit in your corner and cry in peace.
the other 'leaked' article states that the ps3/360 versions will have the same 'lower' player count, while the ps4 and xbox720 will have the 64 player count.
but i agree, that was always my biggest gripe about bf3, was too low of players in a large map. Conquest in particular. Between 2 jets, 2 helicopters, 2+ Tanks, jeeps etc... you were lucky to have 4-5 ground guys left over, actually trying to capture flags.
as lazy as the developers are who make this game, they could probably release a game twice a year!! Saints row 2 to saints row 3 consisted of LITERALLY, the SAME vehicles, names models etc. Slight graphical upgrade but nothing new or really added to the cars inventory. Missions and mini games were almost like they were also ported from the previous game. Stores, clothing were all the same... It was such a let down. Will PASS on anything else from them. Clearly, they've peaked
agreed. THey don't need to fix much..
1.graphic improvement (given)
2.Bigger player count (given)
3.more modes... personally i'd love a bomb planting mode. CS style
mw2 sucked. Please ignore his request
honestly? it's the ONE game that brings everyone on my friends list together. Throughout the year, everyone kind of plays this and that, maybe a couple duplicates, but COD has always brought 6-7 of my closest friends together. And its more about hanging out with them than anything. (and i live out of state) I tried converting them to BF3 but it didn't really take. As we all know, COD appeals to the casual arcade crowd, which is the main reason so many ppl pick it up. I wish it wasn...
'there' . . . not 'their.' Technically
i'd be MORE than happy with just
-Bigger player count in game...
-More customizable options (gun skins, player skins, not camo)
-Obvious graphical upgrade
-Ability to record and share.
That's all
if you feel stupid for paying it... it's most likely because you are. Either through ebay or craigslist, i've never spent more than $35 for a 12 month card. And i've been on for over 5 years. And yes, it IS worth spending the money on. (that being if you have actual friends to play with) Ease of use, party systems/chat...etc.
here are mine... which are decent...
Storm trooper. 49er Player, Luke Skywalker, Han Solo...
https://www.youtube.com/wat...
oh wow, someone likes Cod Black Ops 2 multiplayer, alert the press!
referring to LAG, dumba**
on the 360 it works perfectly and lag is rare (if there IS noticeable lag, the host migration usually soon follows). Glad about the addition to the Hardcore playlist.
yes.
world at war was dated in its ww2 setting, good gameplay for the most part, but nothing special
mw2 turned into an arcade shooter with kids running around with dual shotguns, 10ft knife leaps, and never ending things flying/killing from the air.
black ops was pretty solid, but left room for improvement,
mw3 was more of the same, not really bringing anything new or exciting.
black ops 2 is fresh and well ...
tears.
"wow so many retards to shot down today, so little time. at least the IQ levels here were so low it made it easy." ... exactly. lol
though i'm not as 'bitter' as he is, and actually glad they're coming out with a new console version.... i agree with his points about the lack luster trailer. Copy and paste formula