Brucey..? That you?
Listen, if MS and Sony were arch enemies, Vaios wouldn't ship with pre-installed Windows OS.
Heihachi Mishima. I'll take that :3
Hey mate, you alright. Haven't seen you online on PSN for a while...or perhaps it's me who hasn't been online lol. Anyways, you trolling?
Perhaps he means that he's surprised to see it coming to the PS3 and 360...?
The 'price drop' is no longer visible.
Mirror.
Finishing GTA IV with all side quests in under 30 hours? You sure /you're/ not high?
Just be glad. I live in the UK and was very excited about the new PS store. After having experienced, and though I have to admit that I love the aesthetics, the store itself, including navigation, is extremely slow when compared to the "old" PS Store. So perhaps, when it releases on the other side of the pond, you guys will have a much better first impression than I had.
Erm...I've been using PayPal for a long time, and I've never been charged for any transaction; any /local/ transaction anyways. Yes, their exchange rate for international transactions is pretty crap, but that's where I'm guessing they get their commission from. But other than that, it's a simple payment method.
And to avoid situations where funds are randomly removed from your account, just don't keep funds in your PayPal account. Just link your cred...
There's nothing to be upset about. This is great news. It shows that the Wii U, unsurprisingly, is more powerful than the PS3 and 360, which are 6-7 year old systems. And this also means that Call of Duty on consoles won't look terrible (all relative of course) anymore, and when Sony and MS bring out their next gen consoles, it will be even better, of course that is if they have higher specs than the Wii U, which they mostly likely will do.
Even that's not enough to render Avatar like graphics in real time. You didn't read the article, did you?
I agree. Have you seen the prices of full digital games? For example, I bought BF3 back in February for £30 brand new from Amazon. But on the PS Store, it is STILL £50.
I bought MW3 about 3 months ago for £25, though I still see a steep price of £45 on some high street retailers. But, on PS Store, the game costs, wait for it, £60! And that is without any DLC; just the game.
So, to sum up, optical/physical media isn't going anywhere for a long time....
I buy 1 game a month...sometimes even once every 2 months...
In the end, if it has fun and awesome games that I (a hardcore gamer) can enjoy, I'm all game. However, like everyone says, without word on the other 2 systems, their specs and their games, we won't know which will come out on top.
Does your phone have 1GB dedicated RAM just for gaming? No? That's what I thought. No offence, but if you do not fully understand technology, please don't make ridiculous claims about it.
People who are complaining for the mere 1GB dedicated RAM for gaming and the GPGPU should look at it from another perspective. I will use the PS3 to represent current generation of consoles in this comment due to the fact that many people claim it to be the most powerful console this generation.
The PS3 has 256MB dedicated RAM for games and 256MB for the OS. This means that the WiiU console will have 4x the RAM for gaming AND for the OS.
The PS3 sports a Nv...
"Wii U would be the lead platform for just about a year for multiplatform games" ; Why? Because of it having better specs than current gen consoles? If that were the case, then PC would never have received bad console ports.
I'm not disagreeing with you; it's just that since the Wii U has zero install base, making it a lead platform for multiplat games might not be the best decision.
But of course, I might be completely wrong and it might end up happening any...
Web portal.
A CoD game being RAM intensive? BF3 has 10x the things going on in one match, and it has more players. That works completely fine on all platforms. Muddy because the deva failed at optimising the code for each platform, doesn't make it the console's fault. You are either intentionally being a troll or are genuinely retarted. I am sorry to say that, but you are.