Thought MS said they weren't going?
I can see people taking this out of context
He is saying the Wii-U allows them to create the vision they have for the next Zelda due to the vastly more powerful hardware compared to the Wii/3DS
Glad to hear they are utilising the extra power they get from the Wii-U
Game is going to be amazing!
For me it's been worth buying since MK8 came out.
I make no secret of my PS4 preference, but the Nintendo first party roster is difficult for anyone to match
Any Mario, Zelda, Metroid, DK, Monolith game make a Nintendo console worth owning for me, sure the Wii-U may not have as much 3rd party support, but I can't imagine many fans are buying it for the multiplatform games, but mostly the exclusives, because they are that good.
L...
Calm down people, we have no idea if this is another DDoS attack
http://gearnuke.com/hacker-...
You were saying?
Nice stealth edit there.
Great, more uber hacker nerds wasting time by inconveniencing millions of user wanting to use the service, good job guys!
Cool, looks great!
@nick.
Stop trying to be a diplomat, everyone knows you're a massive Xbox/MS fanboy so stop trying to hide it.
Timed exclusives you mean, I would rather Sony continue to expand their already superior 1st party than waste cash on timed exclusives.
That includes games currently coming to PS4 first.
He said they have no control over what platforms it comes to after the deal ends.
Not only that MS published DR3 and Ryse yet SE are publishing Tomb Raider, diferent scenarios.
Delusions of grandeur my friend.
But Phil said himself MS have absolutely no control over where it goes after the duration expires.
This is also SE we are talking about, I have no doubt it will come to PC and PS platforms after so long.
Ryse and DR3 were also both published by MS, TR is still being published by SE.
Are people forgetting already that it was confirmed as timed exclusive?
But that only gets you so far when it loses a lot of big 3rd party releases like COD, AC and so on.
Personally I would never buy a Wii-U for its 3rd party games, but for its fantastic 1st party.
It's been this way for a long time, at least for me.
And we have barely any details on the game as well.
The multiplayer WAS unique in Brotherhood, unlike anything.
However it really did not change at all with the exception of adding Wolfpack for every title after that, and got stale.
This is a welcome change but I'd be surprised if the mutliplayer didn't return in future.
Let's not forget far superior PR, Sony salving their reputation from the shaky start of the PS3's life, most multiplatform games performing better, great service with PS+, killer roster of 1st party studios.
And significantly not having a console reveal that was a complete disaster, it's not just 'hype' lol
The saltiness is strong with this one
It's talking about how it works to stream games via PS now to various devices, not that it will magically improve the graphics of games you are playing.
Now please make something that has actual good gameplay and not spend all the effort on shiny graphics.
Thought MS said they weren't going? Or are they just showing off a few games? Woops double post