Just because Spike TV and Samuel L Jackson call it a sim doesn't make it a sim. Go play something like rfactor or iracing and you'll have all the answers you need. Forza and GT are sim-arcade at best.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum...
There's a good post to help you start to understand what real driving sims are.
@joecanada
Please point out where I ever said anything close to that because you're just trying to put words in my mouth that I never said. Go troll someone else please or at least take a reading comprehension class.
They never said it would be 9x faster I quote:
"Mantle offers up to 9X more draw calls per second than other APIs by reducing CPU overhead."
"No they are not "active" accounts." Uhh yes they are I think you need to do about 5 seconds of research on the subject. www.google.com
The problem with your argument is that those 77 million weren't active accounts. The 65 million that Valve is talking about are active which they defined as accounts that have been used to play a game at least once in the past month or purchased at least one title in the last month.
"You can't compare 65 million free accounts, of which a large amount are secondary accounts, to 3 million actual console sales." Yeah you can't compare because the console makers have lost a ton of money selling those 3 million consoles where Valve has made money on every one of those free accounts since it only counts accounts that have bought at least one game and are active. Also please post a source where you seem to "know for a fact" that a large amount of the...
@angelic
"This is how I see it, games like those aren't available on PC (more so with Sony titles)"
Uhh you listed a couple short extremely linear generic third person action games with no replay ability and a couple generic corridor shooters all of which have 20 year old gameplay. If you don't think PC has tons of those then I guess you haven't looked at what games are available on PC for the last 30 years or so. My Steam games list if ...
As I said yesterday when you stated that Titanfall will perform better on XB1 than PC, you need to stop posting till you learn about tech a bit. This does and always will outperform consoles at the same res/graphics presets as they do it.
"In 3 years time, when console games are still running perfectly great and perfectly optimised, this machine will be running PC games at a snails pace." By perfectly great you mean at a much lower res/graphics settings/fps than the...
You have absolutely no clue what you're talking about. Not sure if you're just a troll or just that badly informed. This will run rings around the XB1 version of Titanfall at higher resolutions and better graphics. You should learn a bit about tech before posting again.
Funny you seem to get mad about ripoffs then list uncharted and halo both ripoffs themselves.
You must be playing a different Killzone than me because it's never had even close 33k players online. It maxes out at about 2k with it sitting around 500-600 a lot of the time. Even during the free weekend it only got up to about 7k players.
You should know what you're talking about before you open your mouth.
"As the company noted, all shots show purely in-game footage that has not been made in any special photo mode, using no post-processing or filters that aren’t available during the actual gameplay."
Please show me Crysis 3 running fine maxxed on 3 gb ram. Unless you mean just 3gb vram which I can believe, but the consoles don't use all of it's ram for vram and may never get to use 3gb vram. Killzone SF for example only uses 1.1gb for vram the rest is used for other tasks. Games will only get more complex as time goes on and that'll leave less and less unified memory available for vram.
You really have no clue about PC gaming.
Are you really that dumb to use vgchartz numbers for the pc version? You ever hear of something called digital distribution?
@abriael
Exhibit A Final Fantasy XIV:
http://i.imgur.com/88IJhvR....
http://www.darkcarnival.co....
(lol look how horrible that game looks)
Exhibit B Guild Wars 2:
4462d ago 4 agree9 disagreeView comment
"It's irrelevant in a comparison between the two versions of the game." Maybe in your shallow world but not mine.
"When you compare two versions of the game, you compare the two versions of the game using what the GAME provides you, not external options.
It's really simple." Maybe you have to work within those constraints, but I don't I have plenty of options. It's really simple.
"Aside from the fact that Plane...
"The fact that you can force other kinds of antialiasing via video card is irrelevant." That might be irrelevant to you since you can't do any of those things, but I can and do so it's not irrelevant to me by any means.
"Otherwise we could include things like sweetFX in the mix, but it's not what a comprison between two versions of the same game is about. You compare what the developer offers." Next you're gonna say we are only allowed to c...
I expect smarter comments from people with 8 bubbles. You do realize we can push all types of AA through our videocard controls right? Unlike consoles we have all sorts of freedoms to fool with our settings.
"Mind you, FFXIV is the MMORPG that pushes PCs the most" That's just plain false. Much better lookings MMORPGs out there. Not sure why you even listed Witcher 3 since it's not even close to a MMORPG.....
I wouldn't call 12k players playing online PC dead, it's still about 12x the players playing Killzone SF at any given time, but yeah the series is definitely getting less and less popular thankfully. Hopefully Activision learns from this and creates a better game going forward.