and consoles, tv, movies, music, books, sports, broadway, wall street, government, military, etc etc etc.
"google "pc verison of dark souls 2 has lots of problems" and tell me again how pc gaming is "the best"."
Show me one mainstream game for any platform you type that into google for that doesn't have plenty of topics. I can name plenty of console games that are a mess that have no choice but to just deal with it. At least PC gamers don't have to wait for fixes that may or may not ever come. I can't even think of one next gen console A...
"Every mod I see for pc is for graphics."
You're either blind or just turn a blind eye to all the amazing mods out on PC that have nothing to do with graphics. I know it's a pain in the butt to browse the web on those consoles but if you only took a few minutes you'd be amazed at what mods you could find.
"Can't believe people waited just for pretty pixels. Let me know when there are real improvements to the gameplay aspects, an...
Took me over 6 months after I had signed up for to be accepted. It's basically just a waiting game for gaf registration. I've heard stories of it being much shorter and much longer than my wait so all I can say is be very very patient and it'll happen eventually.
I have to agree with cell. They could have easily had jacked up graphics on PC then just scaled them back for the ps4. It's a lot like when devs say the xbox one version looks like the ps4 version of a game and the whole interwebz goes nutz. Except that the power difference is multiplied compared to the power gap between the one and ps4. Not what anyone who games on PC wants to hear. Hopefully it'll be modded to fix these problems.
Doesn't really matter since Minecraft already supports the Rift with a simple mod along with hundreds of other games.
http://minecraft-vr.com/
Oh well at least it'll offset some of that laughable 100/100 review score from Canadian Online Gamers. That was a way bigger joke review than this.
@heavy
That makes no sense.
"First of all, PS+ costs $50 yearly, not $60 or $70," Never said it did cost $60 or $70 a year I said that's how much a new retail game cost like the article suggests.
"(this one http://www.technobuffalo.co... showing that 64 games were given for free." They're not free in any sense of the word. You have to pay every single ...
@heavy
Ok if you think I'm grasping at straws then please explain to me how you can get 37 games for $60-$70 with ps+. Seems to me that you ps fanboys are the ones grasping because my math doesn't come anywhere near the cost of one retail game by using the ps+ format. Remember you can't go over the price of one retail game. With the math you used it's $100 just to be able to play the games for 2 years which is much higher than 1 retail game also. Please explai...
OK but it's still wayyyy more expensive than 1 game because you have to pay for ps+ every month for the rest of your life to have them. Doesn't even come close to the cost of one game for those.
Please explain how you can get 37 games for the price of one with ps+. Last time I knew you don't actually own the games unless you're paying for it. Also don't you only get 1 or 2 games a month? That would cost a whole lot more for 37 games than $60-$70 and even then you don't own them when you stop paying for ps+.
@kim
ahh yes, the usual console fanboy that knows nothing about pc prices. I love you guys :) What I don't love is how cheap these consoles got with there hardware because it's holding gaming/tech back for another 8-10 years. The one good thing about it though is that I only have to upgrade my graphics card this time around which makes it cheaper by a far far margin to console gaming. Either way this isn't a talk about prices it's a talk about graphics and Sta...
Move aside Order because Star Citizen has that beat.
100000+ poly characters
8million+ poly ships
scenes with over 20mill+ polys
All in a non-linear universe running at whatever resolution and fps you want.
I suspect I'm not gonna be shocked at all since I already know it looks better than Infamous. Oh and I could easily reproduce that big jump bomb in Watchdogs simply by going on top of a building and using a simple rocket launcher on the way down. If you believe the lack of shadows, the horrible ai, the repeated buildings(that you can't enter) in the small small world, etc, etc are "game design", then I have some land you should buy down in Florida.
4375d ago 0 agree5 disagreeView comment
Spoken like a true troll. Not surprised after reading the totally senseless pms you tried bombarding me with.
" then again pc gamers dont got much to play anyways besides ports and indie games lol"
I'll gladly go toe to toe on you with a list of exclusives from your system of choice. I guarantee my list will be about 10x+ longer with more variety and innovation. Oh wait you can't because you only have troll bubbles and I blocked you. Saying ...
Played Infamous today and didn't think it looked as good as the 2012 Watchdogs. Especially considering how much more Watchdogs is doing under the hood with it's wind system/weather, day/night cycle, much longer campaign, cars(that you can drive) that actually react to things around them, etc, etc.
Opinions are different from person to person, and that includes reviewers. Where you see a 9.5 near perfect game I played it at my boyz house today and could see some bad spots. The ai was pretty poor, the game got repetitive pretty quick, and it just didn't really add anything new. Where you see an 8.7 too low I see it too high. That's just how these things work.
It's 100% free. D/led it last night it's a great game if you like the old Glory series.
That's great news. If anyone wants to try it the free flash version which I used to play a lot is linked below. It's a really fun indie game. I believe the retail version is a lot more fleshed out, but the flash version will give you a good idea what it's like.
http://not.vlambeer.com/luf...
oops wrong post