Sonic1881

Member
CRank: 5Score: 51450

You mean a time exclusive right? I don't think Starfield would have stayed on Playstation forever

997d ago 14 agree7 disagreeView comment

@Outside_ofthe_Box

You figured him out lol. I've been saying this all along

997d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

@343

Even Mass Effect Legendary Edition can run in 60fps on the Xbox One and PS4 and that game looks better than Starfield especially on the next gen consoles in 60fps. Bethesda is still using an old engine

998d ago 19 agree4 disagreeView comment

What's interesting is that No man sky has a 60fps mode on consoles and Starfield doesn't.

998d ago 18 agree8 disagreeView comment

I have no comment

998d ago 10 agree1 disagreeView comment

Lol they (fanboys) had a change of heart after Starfield became an exclusive 😂 all the concerns are gone

998d ago 14 agree5 disagreeView comment

I'm more of a from Software fan. I like all of their JRPGs especially Bloodborne and Elden Ring

998d ago 17 agree7 disagreeView comment

The Xbox Series X Is a Must-Own Console for *Western* RPG Fans. I fixed it for you

999d ago 40 agree12 disagreeView comment

There's a lot of games that's action with just RPG elements like Assassin Creed which I don't consider it a true RPG

999d ago 9 agree1 disagreeView comment

No Man Sky had so many updates and patches over the years and it's a way bigger game now since it first launch

999d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

"Quality over quantity, is more fun."

But ain't gamepass about Quantity over quality? And I wasn't blown away by Starfield graphics in 30fps. Maybe I'll just have to wait for the final game and see how it turns out

999d ago 12 agree7 disagreeView comment

And yet No Man Sky, Starcitizen, and Mass effect has landing vehicles on every planet 🤔🤔 No man sky can also fly in every planet's atmosphere with ease and without a cutscene

999d ago 33 agree5 disagreeView comment

My bad you're correct but still Microsoft intentions was always going to make Bethesda popular AAA games exclusive since that's what they paid for

1000d ago 31 agree5 disagreeView comment

It's like the FTC is trying to expose Microsoft but most gamers already knew this was going to happen after paying $70 Billion dollars

1000d ago 47 agree21 disagreeView comment

Like I said in my last post. Microsoft intentions was to always make Bethesda games Xbox exclusive but they had to say some games will not be an exclusive but case to case basis to finalize the deal. They're using the same strategy with Activision after the buyout and COD and popular games will be an Xbox exclusive which makes sense after acquiring them for 70 billion. I knew FTC was going to try and use Bethesda acquisition as an argument

1000d ago 59 agree9 disagreeView comment

Even Mass Effect and No man sky has land vehicles 😀

1000d ago 16 agree1 disagreeView comment

The more I hear the more it's reminded me of No man sky but not in a bad way

1000d ago 8 agree8 disagreeView comment

If it's anything like No man sky I can see myself getting bored eventually. I did put in a lot of hours in No man Sky before I started to get bored

1000d ago 2 agree5 disagreeView comment

There's a difference between buying a publisher than a developer. It creates monopolies and takes away revenue.

1000d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

Tbh you can say all 3. Microsoft relied on Halo and Gears for over 15 years

1001d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment