The game is only 6-7 hours. It's more of a narrative movie game
The first game lacked depth as well, but the graphics were phenomenal
I think the high scores and low scores are equal. But for a game that's been in development for 7 years I would have thought it would have gotten higher review scores. But I realized I thought the first game was a mediocre walking simulator with a few combat sections with beautiful graphics. Let's be honest was the first game better than the sequel 🤔
81 on metacritic.com with 77 reviews. I don't think they're suppressing scores but I do realize that some of the review scores hasn't been posted on metacritic.com yet
This game was in development over 7 years. I also expect the overall review score to change in the next few days. There's some review scores that I don't see on metacritic.com yet
What a letdown. Now we know why Microsoft didn't advertise or market it
LMFAO 😂😂
Ouch
I hope you have extra
Just like the first game. Great to look at but was just a walking simulator with a fee combat sections
Gamespot gave this game a 6. Even Stellar-blade a new IP has a better review score than this game 🤔 . I thought Hellblade the first game was mediocre but with great graphics
80 boss fights 😳😲
Absolutely. I can't believe I missed out on this 🤔
This is my first time ever playing this game and I'm enjoying the PC version
As a PC gamer first, I don't think I'll need a PS6
@Rynxie
What about the FPS? Trying to get it in 60fps. Hopefully it doesn't turn out like Dragon's Dogma 2
I'll be playing it on my LG G3 Oled 55 inch TV. I was going to use DLSS 3.0. As long as I can get a stable 60fps is really all that matters to me
My first time playing it and enjoying it in 4K 60fps
I should be able to get 4K 60fps in medium to high settings on my RTX 4080. I noticed they mentioned the rtx 4090 in the article
I just finished Hellblade in under 6 in a half hours. I was surprised how short the game was for the askingprice. I thought the first game was better and be prepared for a lot of walking