And the name of the game is to fuel her flame...
I may disagree with him on several occasions but for the most part, he's pretty rational and partial. In addition, he doesn't say one thing and cleverly tries to stealth. Trust me, I can name quite a few who does that (i'm talking about so-called multi-console owners). Him...nope. I recall he used to be XPC_ (something I forget) and I guess he favored his 360. I don't recall him ever trolling or BSing. However, even if he favors his 360, that's cool. He's no fanboy. He brings up really good p...
aaaaaaaaaaahhhhh.
he's a known trolls and he has a great relationship with kotaku being a fanbaby. ^_^
Hmmmm...I guess a sucker like you (a huge 360 fanbaby) got suckered with a 60 dollar exp...err..."side project".
Too bad.
Eh, it is what it is. I did find it funny that one of the guy's game of the year also happened to be his disappointing game of the year.
Anyway, U2 is my personal GOTY.
Resident Evil 5 is not only the most disappointed game of the year for me, but the most of the generation. Some of the high scores it was getting was laughable. Dead Space is much better IMO. Much Much better.
Sorry for the apparent abrasiveness. Have a bubble. ^_^
Are you saying that cause you played both or saying that cause you're a butt-hurt (your words) 360 fanboy? :D
You're such an idiot. It was made from the ground up on the 360. The assets were then given to sega for the PS3. Think before you write fanboy.
'Why would anyone buy a 360 for a multiplat? I would buy a 360 for its exclusive. Oh wait, that right its all 360 fanatics can come up with in 2009. Come with something better next time. 2010 does look a little better for 360. Well only Splinter Cell does. Let's hope its good."
Huh? dude, multiplatforms are great on eith...
Have you downloaded the Bayonetta demo from PSN? I don't have much room on my hard-rive (I am upgrading very soon though) and I'm wondering if the framerate is as bad as IGN makes it out to be.
@cmbre: Dude, I can't understand that either. Why drag other games into the mud just to say Bayonetta is great. Geez, it's just fuel for fanboyism and pretty much validates what I've been saying. So called 'Journalists' (this includes *shudders* Jim Sterling) are fanboys. Just review the gam...
IGN and some other publications did say that. They didn't say vastly superior but it ran well on the PS3. Maybe we're just seeing different things. I've seen both side by side and no noticeable differences except for the pop-up textures on the 360. Other than that, I don't know how you're getting the GTA4 being F-ed on the PS3. Frame-rates were the same. I didn't see much of a difference.
@Dark General: It's possible. I don't mind that, if it helps with the game. If framerate an...
Well not you, but a lot of them. And i'm sure they don't hug theirs at night.
...
I mean I owned the orangebox for the ps3 and it was bad (but not that bad) but enjoyable. There's not many fast action scenes so the framerate issues didn't bother me. However, while I wasn't really going to buy Bayonetta, I liked the action and I was going to at least rent it. But damn, for fast action game like this, framerate is big big issue. I don't care about the textures because it's hard to see to be honest with you. But with framerate, you can see the stutter it if it's not smooth. T...
I didn't even know about the demo until after I purchased it. lol
...
I agree 100%
It's not really news. I mean, I wonder how bad the PS3 port is. I don't think it's as bad as IGn makes it out to be. I mean, I'll play both versions side by side (my neighbor has a PS3 and 360 and for inexplicable reason, he's getting both) and I'll see how bad it is.
Cause Batman AA was just a shoddy port. Same goes for Assassins Creed 2. (rolls eyes)
This isn't 2007.
...deletes oner post when it mentions anything negative about bloodmask. go figure.