"Rejoice all ye degenerates, the latest patch for Devil May Cry 5 now allows you to see Trish's butt for 3 seconds during a cutscene."
"Recently, Capcom released patch 1.07 for Devil May Cry 5, which added the Bloody Palace mode. However, in an unannounced change, the patch also removed a lens flare that covered Trish's butt in a certain cutscene."
"no information yet on why Capcom decided to remove the lens flare"
...
Ok but how does containing the words "God" or "high" make it any less family friendly? Too much God? Now that's bad censorship. I get you want to argue your point which is totally fine it just doesn't make any sense. I brought up Sony because Sony has caught a ton of flack over censorship recently and now here's an example of censorship under the MS umbrella so it makes sense to questio...
Why would words like "God" or "high" require an M rating for a game? See this argument that's being spun makes no sense. Its clear the ESRB is being used as an excuse here to give MS a pass which is hypocritical. If people want to act outraged over censorship I have no issue with that but the outrage should be equal no matter who's doing it.
I was asking a simple question I find it odd though that I'm somehow "stirring the pot" yet people getting outraged over a lens flair to as you say "not expose skin" is somehow not stirring the pot and creating controversy. Seems to me censoring is censoring and I find it very telling that in this case excuses are being made for it.
I agree lot boxes are bad and need to go but I'm defenitly apprehensive of government in any form controlling what happens in gaming, again its a slippery slope.
Looking at the related articles and many of the comments here some people took it like they already had a partnership so clarification was apparently needed.
