Why you need 1080p, to catch the subtle expressions, otherwise it might as well be a turnip running around with a gun.
Ha ha just kidding my poor XB brothers
No mention of game performance, frame rate, graphics ect?
Both consoles have a strong line up for the near future. Yes, XB1 is strong with the big hitters on the way as well as backwards compatibility.
PS4 titles might be a little further out, but we who choose one console per generation needn't fret, PlayStation games will be among the best when they arrive if past history is any kind of marker.
I don't see anything for owners of either system to complain about. I chose PS4. I only have the Witcher 3. MGS4 is coming, the def...
In all previous games I would restart a stage upon setting off alerts. I loved the mechanics, and the games were not overly big. I never tired of tapping a wall and seeing a question mark over an enemies head, Huh??
I am confident that the scale of MGSV will suit me, in that I won't tire of metal gear stealth mechanics and I won't feel the need to restart, I can go Rambo if I mess up. And gather myself together to try and complete the next objective as a shadow. Played Sons of...
I know that a lot of comparisons between this and previous titles always comes to less cut scenes. I would say that if what puts you off MGS is cinematics and story then naturally avoid MGSV. As a fan of the series I believe you need to buy into all the crazyness and longwindedness of it all to get the most out of it. I imagine/hope that cassette tapes ala Peace Walker, codec converations, annoying earpiece interjections from Mother base, and cutscenes will feature a lot.
Now, if you ...
I don think we should boycot MGSV. It will take Konami some time to realize what problems they have caused from the top down. We might aswell make it a more painfull lesson by making MGSV a success, if it deserves it?
No, Sons of Liberty did not have a flying fortress! Arsenal Gear was submersible. This is Metal Gear Solid, not Marvels Avengers.
Submersible. Hence the facility known as Big Shell was built upon it while it was submerged.
You did ask.
Ha ha, we are watching and rewatching Mark Cerny dismiss the cloud for any possibility of improving visual performance of a console. That would include fps, no?
(he was the chief architect of a console that released before, was less expensive, was better made, was easier to code for, and was more powerful than its rival. We think we trust him on this)
signed: Sony Armchair devs. Lots of love
Thanks, was only asking, guess I was wrong on that one. Perhaps it was general performance of both consoles when they were revealed that made them unhappy?
I'm sure Crytek will Maximize any new potential, the more XB1 and PC share.
(Kurt Kobain singing it is much better, unfortunately the wrong period). Actually one of my favourite Nirvana songs, strangely enough.
Just reinforces their stupidity and mismanagement, IMO.
Had it been an XB1 where would he have hid the power brick??
edit: see above!
Question. Did Crytek not say the complete opposite before now?? Just curious to whatever motivates them.
Certainly a great feature if implemented that I wish my PS had, for sure. (don't want it playing Xbot games ha ha) Credit where credit is due, with 360 compatibility already.
They did release a $99 console. Then they charged stupid money for it, name was XBox One.
10/10. If you have played Phantom Pain then please give us all a review.
Thank you.
MGS4 deserved a score like 16/20 or 17/20. (MGO was ace)
I hope MGSV is a 19/20 as its the reason I purchased a PS4.
Yeah, but Snakes butt was too next-gen when doing the worm. I'm glad that's gone.
I enjoyed the trailer very much. A question though. Why was the XBox One version of the Phantom Pain shown at the very start? It looked like a PS1 title.