we went over this last night mate! bayonetta DID for the most part have points knocked off, and the bad ps3 port WAS talked about in reviews, so why would people come out asking for something that WAS happening? ok does that answer your question? now i would like you to answer some, why is it that when a ps3 game gets a bad port it must be talked about till the end of time, but when 360 gets a bad port it must be brushed under the carpet? why do you think edge reviewed only the 360 version, y...
the way i see it everyone regardless of console orientation should pass on this game! 360 fans should pass on it because of the bad port they received, ps3 owners should pass on it due to the extra time they were made to wait while the 360 version caught up, the possible gimping (linear, graphics etc). But most importantly BOTH camps should pass it up due to the pure LIES SE told! if you want to be lied to, or ok with being blatantly made out to be a mug then fine go buy it, but more fool you...
its been known for a long long time that the ps3 version was the better one, but then look at when those screenshots were released! you know the photoshopped ones lol, SE came out denying it was done on purpose (yeah right), even saying they had no reason to make up pics as they look "comparable"... well the truth came out! they were lying! my question is why? why lie? they knew the truth right? then we have jurnalists just brushing off the differences, as though they were nothing! ...
im glad they saw fit to dock points, however, after actually reading the thing they dont really make sense. one minute they are saying that its no big deal (graphics) then they say it is, then it isnt again lol, whats it to be? then he says the ps3 version cut-scenes take up 30gig, but hes confused as to why the 360 version got compressed and upscaled ones... erm disk space maybe? just a wild guess lmao... say the 360 version had uncompressed fmv, how many disks would they need? im thinking a...
bravo to them, still not interested in buying this game, but im really pleased to see atleast 1 site tell the truth, gives me a little ray of hope that game jornalism isnt completely dead!
what kinda logic is that? im not saying bayonetta want a bad port, but you seem to deny or rather wont admit that this game is also a bad port, and the lesser version... you brush off the differences as tho they were nothing! and thats why i wont take you seriously... ok the differences arent the same as with bayonetta, but so what? they are differences all the same, and it should be talked anout in reviews.. you didnt actually answer any of my logical points lol, choosing to only answer what...
have you thought that internet vids are just not very good quality? and its easier to get good quality pics on the net than it is video, even video that says its HD isnt! the only way to truely see these things would be to play them side by side, using the exact same tvs etc... and whos gonna do that? lmao... and look i dont even care about the game ps3 or 360, but its pretty universally recognised that this time 360 got the bad port! sub-hd, even the cut-scenes! 3 disks etc... all im saying ...
you know too well that the ps3 version got patched dont play dumb... oh wait lol... but yes you are right that the reviews wouldnt have known it was to be patched, and my point is not that bayonetta should have scored equally, my point is this game shouldnt either!... as for the 1up part you pulled out, i didnt leave that part out cos i didnt see it, i didnt give them a hit, and didnt read the whole article... im not saying the 360 game is unplayable, never have, but its funny that you should...
"It's still an impressive-looking game, no question, but when I went back from 360 to PS3 it was almost like someone had stripped a layer of grime off my TV. The PS3 version is just that much crisper and more colorful." this kind of thing just happens too many times for it to be a conicidence, look at the whole ghostbusters thing, i will admit both bayonetta and ghostbusters were bad ports, not unplayable though, i just dont support those kinda games so didnt buy em... i played t...
bayonetta 90 360 (meta) 86 ps3... the reason no ps3 fans complained about equal scores is because plenty of reviews DID note the differences and DID mark down the ps3 version... as ive said sony patched it too to have a similar framerate and to inprove load times... anyway in the reviews for this game only 1 review so far has deducted points from the 360 version, sorry i say points but i menat POINT! one point off? lmao edge review the 360 version, give it a 5 then post it on ps3 meta but not...
thats one hell of a load time no? lmao... the only thing you said that could effect gameplay is framerate, and like i said my friend didnt even know there were any problems! cos sony patched it! to me i think you spend more time playing the game looking at the graphics than you do loading stuff, so for me graphics are more important than a 1-2 minute load difference.
so could you please explain to me how loading screens effect a game more than graphics? so you sit there saying wow that load was fast? but when the graphics are sub-hd with loads of jaggies you say nothing? oh and arent the load times for this game meant to be worse on the 360? frame rate i agree with you, however, didnt sony patch bayonetta? i have a friend on psn how got beyonetta, he was telling me about it, saying it was good etc... i ask him if he knew about the problems and he didnt......
you said you hated sony cos they lost ff exclusive, so im interested in what you think about the 3 disk sub hd version the 360 got? Also id like to know will you be getting that version.
is this the surprise game that gttv were talking about? its just im a little confused... ive seen that this game was reveiled on psblog or something... but the gttv thing said it was an exclusive reveal... so how was it exclusive? anyway not that it matters, this looks pretty awesome... more exclusives the better, from here on out i see the ammount of exclusives really ramp up... all the hard work building the engines has been done for most of the games, now they have so many awesome engines....
when is it supposed to be reveiled? isnt it today? any idea what time?
ok it wouldnt be a mind blowing suprise, cos we all know its coming, however, its a more than welcome adition to the ps3 library, in my opinion.. your just setting yourself up for a let down too pwned.
id want them dead too lol... its just kids though mate, guess their mum bought em the wrong console and they are bitter about it... they heard halo was the best game ever... yet they see ps3 get amazing game after amazing game and they just cant hack it... so they wanna spoil peoples fun, shame but thats the internet for ya.
regardless of what sony says this will defo not be the last we see of kratos... thgey wouldnt build that engine for just one game, especially on a franchise as big as god of war... and did you see the interview that hiphopgamer did? seems they are going to be making a fighting game with the god of war cast lol.. cant say im too interested in that though... but yeah id bet my life that this wont be the last god of war.
it would be pretty damn hard to ruin god of war, try as they might though lol... tell you one thing i reckon there may well be some backlash/tit-for-tat when alan wake and reach get released... personally i wouldnt stoop to their level, and they dont get many decent games so i just feel sorry for em lol... i mean why else would they troll ps3 news dropping off spoilers if they were not butthurt and jealous? we should offer them some cuddles really lol.
at the time of release for bayonetta, it had a bad frame rate, and as it was an action game should of been docked points and it was... i have no problem with that, it was sorted out via a patch but as jokes on you said yesterday the reviewers were not to know that... anyway FF is not an action game! its turn based so frame rate really doesnt matter does it? it wouldnt really effect the game, FF is all about story and the world in which its set, plus its heavy on cgi cut scenes... now cos the ...