there you are assuming what im saying again! when did i say he lied? im saying i dont believe it! but hey maybe he does? i dont know... either way i think its a fairly silly thing to say, knowing how people will jump on it... and if and when god of war 4 comes out i just know people will say... why doesnt it look twice as good as 3? they said they only used 50% last time etc etc.... indeed these numbers are plucked from thin air... so my point is why use them? ofcourse he could say that he be...
ive already said improvement can be made! but they are saying god of war 3 used only 50% and im saying i dont believe it did! or does... come on man look at that game! ND said they maxed out the ps3... then they said that they could still improve though... god of war 3 then come out looking better (slightly) than U2... like i said in my previous post i think god of war 3 uses all of the ps3 power, but yes they can optimize further for sure... twice as much though? hmmmm sorry i just dont thin...
and what would they have to sacrifice to make the game 1080p if they are only using 50%? also it cant be that hard to do 1080p, if you can adjust resolution on a pc easilly? and you call me naive when you can belive god of war 3 uses only 50% power? lol... im saying yes they can no doubt improve the engine and make an even better looking game, but twice as good looking? nah i dont think so... maybe i am completely wrong but my logical mind just cant believe 50%... if he said like 80% i could ...
and that doesnt explain why its not 1080p... as for alan wake, it uses loads of fog (old skool tricks) and i still dont think it looks that good, and its not out yet, come on people i know there can be improvements, but u really believe 50 percent?
and im not saying they cant improve the engine, or they cant make a better looking game, but if gow3 only uses 50 percent power why didnt they up the fps and resolution? i just cant believe 50 percent for gow3 sorry.
but sorry i cant believe that.. why isnt the game 1080p rock solid 60fps then? Look the game is damn hot! Best lookin game etc, i cant wait! But 50 percent? Hmmm nah.
im sorry but you cannot talk for the whole socom community! there is a guy down below somewhere who says hes a hardcore socom fan, and cant wait to use it! your just one little person, so you bought some gmaes, thats cool but sony are not about to develop what YOU want because of that... and your going on about development time programming for the move... man its just button mapping! i bet it took them no time at all, infact they even said how easy it was! and anyway sony wont just rush it ou...
like erm wtf is wrong with adding another OPTION to the way you play socom? i mean ok you dont wanna use move (even though you never know you really might like it), thats cool dont use it then, they are not FORCING it on you at all... they said BOTH controls are available on the same disk... because you dont like motion controls (im not that keen either), you dont want anyone else to have the choice either? isnt that a tad selfish?
yeah i say it how i see it too, and the game looked good imo... its not like its being released next month either is it? lmao they have time to polish it dont worry... and anyway if you think other games will be better, then well just buy those other games... its no biggy right? you dont like mag? thats cool, buy/play one of the other awesome ps3 shooters, thats what variety is all about aint it?
guess you didnt watch GDC then? yes they showed gameplay... too pawned is slightly exagerating though i feel, it looked pretty good i thought, and if hes referring to reach, well sorry but that doesnt look all that either, and your comparing fps to tps, the polish will be applied to socom tho i have no doubt, and K3 will brush off reach no worries lol... i do have to laugh at all my dissagrees, does anyway fancy elaberating?
did everyone else laugh when the japanese guy brought out the move, there was just silence? lmao i mean come on "id like to introduce you to the playstation move" YEAH MAN WE KNOW!! just show us what it can do! lol... and they go on about how the wii croud will "move" (see what i did there lol) over to the ps3... but will they? do wii owners (casuals) care about precision? do they care about HD graphics? will they fork out for a PS3 to have it? when they already got their ...
it still looks a bit odd, but i know why it has to look like that, and its not a major issue... the nunchuck type thing needs a new name! i cant even remember what it was, hense why i said nunchuck lolm, it was playstaion move sub controller or something, not very exciting... all in all it wasnt too bad i suppose, socom 4 using it was obviously the big annoucement, however, i just dont know if id sit there using that, when i could just use the DS3, hmmmm maybe id give it a go... i think the p...
didnt you used to be a giant enemy troll? you know before you bought a ps3? one of them aint it? lol... before i saw your comment i thought f**k it, its the open zone, its a ps3 article if xbox fans come in here its their own fault right? so i was gonna add, disk scratching, battery powered controllers, sounds like a chainsaw! disk tray,E74, no games lmao... people call me a fanboy or a loyalist, but i dont go into xbox articles trolling and never have! i used to have a 360 too... just gotta ...
im in the uk too, i thought it was on at 12am? not 4! lmao
anyway dude its actually worse than you say, the edge did review the 360 version! infact its the only version they reviewed! they said on a side note that they had looked at the ps3 version or something similar... its just they posted the 360 review in the PS3 section and NOT the 360 section... when its the 360 they reviewed! now get your head around that one!!! lmao... im glad your not like all the other people though saying there is no bias, or at the very least something very fishy going o...
even soda the big 360 fanboy knows there is bias in the media lmao... i noticed the review ammounts were a little outdated too but it was rather pathetic to pull him up on it seen as it didnt effect the meta score, if it did effect the score id say fair play...
EDIT: ha ha ha i didnt even notice he had them round the wrong way pmsl, thats hilarious! telling people to "look again" but getting it wrong yourself lol. wow soda concentrate next time your calling someone ou...
take a look at how many below 80 scores the ps3 version has, then see if they are on the 360 side! lol nope... i reckon meta just dont want the 360 side to drop below 80 meta, which with these below 80 scores it no doubt would... pathetic really aint it.
you forgot to add more light too, thats why the 360 has a lack of shadows! they added more light to the 360 game lmao... now you mention all the other extras ill defo be getting the 360 version! lol
yes i would love to hear it! please jason 360 enlitighten us? i thought you said to me before the more reviews the better the score? you know that was your reason for why ME2 360 has a better average than the PC version! remember? so how come this is not true here? lmao... ill be waiting........
look i hear you and i do understand that, however, i dont see how wacking more eneemies or particle effects on screen will take that much time and money... if gow3 is using 50% power then surely they could just add more enemies easilly? and up the fps? easilly? even add more partocle effects? i mean making the characters from scrath is what takes the time no? then doing the ai engine etc, basically the bare bones and the undelying engine (the stuff we dont see) but when they have the tools ma...