That gif is hi-lar-i-ous.
wefoijawoighawoighawoigjawjfa lfknalsfnvawofeihwaoiefhawoiehg oiwjefoiwjefoiawfe
I don't think Home was a failure. A lot of people still play it today.
The funny thing about these reviewers is that they are the same ones who said that MW2 story mode was 8-10 hours long. Fvcking liars!
If anyone cared to actually READ the article they would see the point that Jim Sterling was making. Sterling was making the point that it wasn't the 360's fault it was Square Enix's own damn fault for developing FF13 that way.
Here is a quote of what he says, "You want to blame something for Final Fantasy XIII's issues, then you blame the people who were responsible. You blame Square Enix. Don't go making a boogie man out of a hunk of plastic and wires because you're too la...
Your statements lead to one question. Do people want to play games without a controller?
don't forget the sushi bar!
I agree this game does look pretty interesting. It reminds me a little bit of PAIN that was released on PSN.
Hell yeah! I just went back to Killzone 2 after a few months and I am loving it.
There is a difference between second and third party studios. Yes you could say Insomniac was a third party studio, but it is their close relationship with Sony that makes them a second party studio. You have to admit there is a distinct difference between Epic Games and Insomniac. Yeah, both are third party, but which one would you expect to be making Sony games. Also, Sony has the rights to all of Insomniac's IPs. See, that's the difference between third and second party studios. A second p...
I would disagree with that because Insomniac is a 2nd party studio not a 3rd party studio. So the guy is clearly wrong on that part... idiot.
I laugh everytime I read in one of your comments that you say you aren't biased.
This website is pure gold.
http://www.gamecritics.com/
I am never going to go to IGN, GameTrailers, GamesRadar, 1up or Gamespot again. This site is all I need. Higher level writing and the reviews are well thought out and well written.
I'm pointing out how GT is a biased site. 9.2 is a great score, don't get me wrong. It's just that GT is biased and many scores for PS3 games are lower than they should be because of that.
They are really inconsistent with their reviews:
They gave Uncharted 2 a 9.3 because it wasn't original enough to score anywhere above that. YET they gave MW2 a 9.5 WITHIN weeks of the Uncharted 2 review.
GT is biased, I think so.
Also, giving NHL 09 a 9.3 and GO...
I ain't saying 9.2 is a bad score. I'm saying Gametrailers is biased and many of the PS3 reviews get lower scores because of it INCLUDING God of War 3. What I'm trying to say is that you shouldn't trust any GT score REGARDLESS of the number they give it BECAUSE they are a clearly biased site.
Also, most of the PS3 games they review include major spoilers and them bagging on the game to make it look bad no matter how good the game is.
i.e.: Uncharted 2
It's as if GT w...
I agree completely. Not one single PS3 exclusive has gotten a 9.5 or higher on Gametrailers while SEVERAL 360 exclusives have gotten 9.5 or above.
Edit:
Just for those of you who don't believe here are the three highest rated PS3 exclusives and here are the three highest rated 360 exclusives.
PS3
LittleBigPlanet- 9.4
Uncharted 2- 9.3
MGS4- 9.3
Xbox 360
Ghost Recon: AW- 9.9
Halo 3- 9.8
Gears of War 2- 9.5
Fo...
Seriously just watch any EyePet video and you'll see that the EyeToy has a depth sensor. Natal fanboys are idiots, they don't even realize that the EyeToy and Natal are THE EXACT SAME THING.
You DO realize that the Eyetoy and Natal do practically the same thing. Hell, I'm seeing the Eyetoy do things that the M$ hype machine hasn't even brought up as to whether Natal could do or not.
Just look at Eyepet or Eye of Judgement, both of those games are doing more than what Natal has ever promised.
Sadly enough, gaming nowadays is not about getting better to compete. It's about making the game easier so everyone can play. Hardcore gaming is dying and it makes me sad. :'(
Edit: I BLAME MW2 FOR THIS.
The REAL problem with grenades in UC2 was that you could throw them AS you were dying.
"I'm one shot from dying. Might as well throw a grenade instantaneously. Herp derp."
Grenade is thrown. Other player dies.
Good review, but I still don't understand the 0.1 scale on a rating system. I mean realistically, what the hell is the difference between an 8.9 and a 9.0?
I don't think you need to worry. All the fans of his site know that everything he says is a joke or is highly sarcastic. Just from what I read out of the comment section from time to time, 90% of the people get the message he sends in his HIGHLY SARCASTIC articles.