Sony's studios have already hinted and indicated several times that they are working on next gen games. I would say 2012 or 2013 at the least. Beyond that I am not sure. With the recent price drop they seem to be wrapping up the PS3's console cycle.
I don't know. IGN went easy on Ratchet and Clank all 4 One while others were ready to bury it. Maybe they are not so bad after all and there is hope for them yet. Just a thought. Feel free to disagree
That is what everyone says until the next game.For instance LG looks fantastic and it isn't even finished yet.
Some developers think if they badger them enough they will get new consoles. Not sure why they want them though.Most of them will use all that power to make the same games they do now only shinier. BF3 is supposed to be 'the greatest game ever' for this year and on PC or console it still looks like an overblown snooze fest and will probably still have a million and one glitches, cheat hacks and balance issues.
Rage looks graphically superior and still can't be any...
Killjoy.
I am tired of people going on about multiplats being better. Many exclusives AND multiplats have done badly and have been ignored by gamers. Bulletstorm only got to a million units across three different platforms while UC2 has sold 5 million units on the PS3. Batman AA sold millions while games like Conduit and Alan Wake crawled along at a snail's pace.Child of Eden got excellent scores but barely sold anything despite it being multiplat.Every game can't be marketed aggressively or w...
Oh yeah, that makes sense. Each Ratchet game just has new worlds, new weapons, a new story, new gadgets, new characters, new enemies and extra stuff every game (death matches, bike racing, grinding, spaceship flying, gliding, buggy driving, multiplayer competitive, 4 player co-op, a giant building smashing Clank)plus they were the first ones to create spherical worlds before Nintendo did it with SMG.But yeah Nintendo 'reinvents' Mario all the time. Sure they do.
@ Ric...
That's BS. Many reviewers said R3 was the best Resistance out their and most scores were above average. It was better then many of the crappy shooters like Homefront, Duke Nukum and Bodycount which everyone insisted would be so great. Even the hater of games Yatzee thought it was good. Please don't talk if you have nothing to say please.Just because the new Ratchet formula didn't go over well with everyone doesn't mean it is the worst R and Clank ever.
I love it when people try to desperately find fault in UC3. It makes me want it even more. Its amazing how people will accept every obvious fault that games like DI and Rage have but dig deep trying to find fault for UC3 nitpicking the slightest snafu or detail. Bulletstorm's environments looked like bland movie set props but people refused to acknowledge that as a problem and defended BS to the death.Try harder. No one but killjoys care.
Yawn. I am guessing no one cares about the 8s, 4 out of 5s and As its gotten? I am guessing that everyone will pay attention to the Destructoid review because its the lowest? Yeah that's what I thought.
Other sites have given it As, 8s and 4 out of 5s . But like all reviews on this site everyone troll and fanboy alike decend on the lowers score. R3 got lots of 9s and 10s but everyone could only see the 7s. Just because this site gives it a bad score suddenly that condems the whole game?
Rage got very low scores on certain sites but many people ignored those sites claiming they had no idea what they were talking about. Why not believe the 8 out of 10 as opposed to this 4.5 o...
That is one of the stupidest ideas in the history of gaming. This doesn't concern people buying the game new, so why should that affect the score?Are we going to start grading the game on how well it MIGHT sell in the bargin bin too? ' I took off points because I don't think gamers will buy this game used'. Is it any wonder I can't take Kotaku seriously? @ disturbing_flame. interesting thought *looks at Kotaku* Hmmmmmm......
Make more room on your trophy shelves ND.
@ -Alpha. Didn't they say they say that they reduced the sprinting time? Are you telling me that still isn't enough? It's almost annoying how gamers exploit these things. Maybe they should have just left it out completely.
They have fixed it. Your joke is no longer funny.
Nathan Drake appears.'Move over old man. Let a pro show you how its done'.*Indy punches Drake* *fight starts*.
@ Virus201 that is the most BS I have heard in the longest while. I am sorry but all fanboys whine equally. Please stop the this fanboy is better then that one $hit please. I think we have moved beyond that by now.On topic. I am sorry but at what point did Gears 3 get in the conversation? I thought we were talking about UC3 getting another ninety something score? Can everyone talking about Gears 3 go to the 360 part of the site. No UC3 fan gives a crap about Gears 3. Go away and let us celebr...
Hmmmm... Intresting.
You can't kill people with mental illnesses. They are not responsible for what they are doing. Arkum needs to update and improve their methods
Why bother pointing out faults ? No one will listen anyway. Just smile and nod. @ mendicant you misunderstand. I am talking about people in general. I never stated the GT5 didn't have faults, its just that people seem to ignore Forza 4's more. Most gamers ignore glaring faults in games and are usually in denial e.g. Rage and DI.