"Who the hell cares?"
Yet you post here.
Fans care high-speed. People who have played as a werewolf in bloodmoon and know that a werewolf kicks more ass than the vampires in morrowind. That is who cares.
That is all cute and all for the ps3 that it will be 5 years soon. But he was clearly talking about the 360 if you bothered to read. And weather you know it or not, he is not the only person screaming for a new console.
Cheaper! Lol I sell extra DLC codes and free avatar items all the time on ebay and I don't sell them cheaper.
DVR set to record! Thanks For the post scholla!
That is good to hear. I have not seen all the perks, but jumping and attacking seems like a reasonable perk to put in.
How is the lack of lock on targeting a con for a game series (at least for morrowind and oblivion) that has not had it before? It wouldn't work well in a game like skyrim. I hate lock on targeting. It is a crutch for poor avatar manipulation which neither morrowind and oblivion had. So I doubt skyrim will struggle with hitting or shooting a target based om my experience. It should be up the player anyway in a rpg title such as this. You miss you die, you hit you live is how it should be a...
WTH! you never heard of trade in credit. What are you thirteen? I have $10 on skyrim, if I get $15 for rage trade-in then that means I have $25 credit towards the purchase of skyrim when it releases. What the heck don't you get about that!? And until battlefield 3 comes out I will finish getting rage's achievements. Damn do you really need it spelled out more than that!?
If so here ya go: 5206d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment
I fail to see your point. Nothing about development times is going to change and the pay off is the developers problem not mine. They should make better games, and next gen could potentially give them the tools to do so. It is up to them to learn how to use those tools. And nothing about that will stop me wanting to move to the next gen.
Kratos, people just have no concept of beta testing. Sadly even if you give them the tools to figure it out in a excellent +1 bubble earning fashion.
How many publishers do this? And EA can limit early access to it's game to whoever they want. This won't stop anyone from buying the game. It looks to me EA wants it's Battlefield fans to review it's games.
It has always been easier and shorter to rank up in the beta vs. the final build for battlefield games. Why are people surprised?
Why is a Taliban sitting in a humvee with a 50.cal and a MI-24 hind is flying in the background!? The first pic shows a XM-8 rifle. Doesn't look like the devs of this game bothered with any research.
This is the longest collective console gen ever, and you think people are rushing into it over graphics? I don't see what you mean there. My move into next gen is dictated by console makers. And they are not rushing anything.
Not unusual when a beta is so close to release of the final build.
That is fine. Morrowind got it's werewolves via DLC so skyrim can.
Skyrim comes out a few weeks after BF3. What about that you don't get or find funny.
If being offsides is wrong, I don't wanna be right.
I too am glad they provided the privilege for us to play the beta. But I totally do not agree there was a backfire. If you dug through the ignorance of a lot of blogs then you would have figured out, many people perceived the beta as a demo. Dice was unyielding in it's claim that we were playing a beta and not a demo. I bet you none of those articles complaining about the beta (some even called it a demo) reported one single issue with it on dice beta forums.
A beta is ex...
And I helped!!!
3 year development (bf3) vs. 1 year (cod)
Someone is handing in the same work they did last year with a different name on it.