Sillyace92

Contributor
CRank: 10Score: 66100

Here's a hint, they never bought it in the first place...maybe you can figure out the rest

5185d ago 5 agree1 disagreeView comment

Remake or Remaster?

5205d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Maybe you should ask Nintendo

5205d ago 15 agree1 disagreeView comment

Let me add some context to this, before people start talking out of their a**

Developer gets mad at IGN because his game gets a bad score.

He sees a minor incorrect detail in the review (which is trivial) and in a fit of rage complains and descredits IGN.

I doubt that the ending would have made the game score any higher. It's like a review mentioning that there isn't an option in the menu to change something, and is so trivial it'...

5206d ago 7 agree9 disagreeView comment

Good stuff, especially about Directional Audio, I really hate that

5207d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

@TmanX1
Nice Blog post

@Nate-Dog
Yeah I thought the same exact thing in regards to the campaign.

Here's a statement by the person reviewing Battlefield 3 for GAMETRAILERS.com (Marcus Beer).
http://www.annoyedgamer.com...
And his initial impressions of this whole debacle.

5212d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

"That doesn't prevent bad scores. It just delays them. "

eh, yes and no. Accredited sites such as IGN, Gamespy, etc. will not affect their scores, which you're right, BUT other lesser know sites would potentially alter their score to be more favorable of BF3 to get on EA's good side and thus they would be able to publish their reviews early to garner hit's and recognition. But that's the problem, because these favorable (possibly false) reviews ...

5212d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Why because those games don't deserve to be bought new? Only Battlefield does because it has multiplayer?

5215d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

BRAPP BRAPP

5216d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

I have the same problem

5230d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Same

5239d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Probably, why else would there be a stack of games on the floor with an empty shelf in front of it

5246d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The answer is yes loljk

5248d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I Pledge to Go Commando On September 20th

5248d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I don't understand it when people say that the PC version will be better, at least graphically. PC's don't have a universal setting, they're all dynamic some worse then others. And it's possible that some of the worst performing PC's will fail to the consoles in graphical fidelity.

I just don't understand, dumb fanboys I guess (referring to Washington-Capitals)

5249d ago 15 agree14 disagreeView comment

Yes because so many people are acclaiming CoD for it's diversity /sarcasm

5254d ago 5 agree5 disagreeView comment

You do realize that if CoD ran at 30fps it could output a resolution double of what it currently is at right now. You're comparison makes no sense.

CoD 30fps at 1200 res vs BF3 30fps at 702 res, which is better again?

5255d ago 11 agree33 disagreeView comment

@ATi_Elite and @jimmywolf

So tell me, you're selling or trading the hats to someone, correct? Doesn't that mean someone else on the recieving end is essentially buying those hats?

The ability to trade doesn't deter from the fact that people buy useless things in game. So if you were intelligent you would realize that it doesn't only occur in CoD.

5256d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

You mean like hats in TF2? Not so stupid when it's not CoD, right?

5257d ago 23 agree6 disagreeView comment

@Halochampian

They're using an updated engine it's called Infinity Ward engine 5.0. And Blizzard is also using an updated engine called Frostbite 2.0.

5258d ago 1 agree5 disagreeView comment