very well put. Saying Epic can make any of Gears of War available on the PS3 is equivalent to saying Guerilla Games can make any Killzone available on the 360. Its all Bollocks. So stop useless console fanatic bull already. Esp to that subset of PS3 fans, I don't know why you would want GeOW so badly instead of a totally new IP set in an entirely different place(hopefully a vibrant and living one).
that was a terrible photoshop job
I reread reviews for the original game and I am lowering my expectations for this game. I will let the game define itself when it releases than the hype. I would rather get all hyped for something thats coming soon like Lair. MGS4 though is a different story.
I am so looking forward to MGS4 especially since it is the last in the series.
The problem is universal, but fascists have a very hmm significant history.
my reaction is a combination of WTF and LMAO
I feel the resolution is hurting this game as there seems to be no AA
ignored by 86 users, wow and your comments, honestly you seem like you want to dash the hopes of underage Halo fans and make them cry.
The graphics as in model detail, textures and shaders is actually not different from PC. But the PC version played at cr!ppy fps, I expect PS3 to have a much more steady framerate. I played 360 demo, it seems the shadows are of higher quality.
If Apple released Wii, it would have cost 500 bucks(see iPhone). And Nintendo is more modest with their ads compared to Apple's f'ugly "Mac vs PC" ads (They are so terrible even a Caveman would do better ads).
now release the freaking demo
I see you were exaggerating, I have to agree though PS3 is the cheapest way to get max out of UT3 esp because of PC Mods support. My language was a bit unnecessary, sorry about that. Personally, I will decide after I see how the demo runs on my everything-crappy-but-8800GTX system
I have to totally agree here
"QUAD SLI 8800 ultra ,4 GB DDR3 up to 1500MHz ram ,2 x QUADcore 1333FSB intel, 10K HDD and FULL install in HDD.. yes in PC its a bit faster than conosle .."
sorry this is bullsh!t, Epic has always been great at PC optimization not just graphic quality, don't underestimate. I ran UT2K4 at acceptable framerates, max quality @ 1024x768 with a crappy FX5200(I bought it a day or so after it was released). I expect same kind this time.
damn what kind of lunch would drain MS? Whatever it is, after eating it you would be rolling around the world causing widespread chaos like in Beautiful Katamari
if I ran Microsoft for a day, my body would be malfunctioning and my brain riddled with exotic viruses.
If I ran Apple, I would lose all my bloody rights. I would be in house arrest.
If I ran Open Source, I would be open all kinds of changes including the unnecessary and unwanted ones.
WTF
"main thing is no need for a 360 all the main games come out on pc eventually halo/gears...."
yeah something is very wrong with Bladestar.
As for Halo 3 PC, you will get it at 2010
Halo 1 story was not boring, it was the repetitive levels. Halo 2 had cliffhanger ending but still presentation was very good(texture pop ins sucked though). Its no secret there are many gamers not just Halo fanboys waiting for a conclusion to that story in Halo 3.
btw anyone know what kind of exclusivity this is? Is it also going to be like Gears? Coming the next year or simultaneously on PC
maybe in 20 years we will get "Master Chief & Solid Snake Olympics" staring Marcus from Gears of War