Oh, my. People are so engaged in this so called "console wars". Anything MS does is somehow put under a bad light. So, now, if retailers decide you cannot have a choice (because, at least for now, Xbox Pass is optional) of getting your games cheaper (which makes sense if you're not worried about physical disks and software licensing vs ownership) it's perfectly OK, and it even alligns with consumers best interest, as long as it hurts Xbox brand. Tell me about backfire...
Oh, no! More options! Help!
You could be more polite, but nice, thanks.
Time to launch on Xbox and Switch!
Digital Foundry is wasting its time. Resolution, fps, effects, texture filtering, nothing of this matters anymore, well, at least since Xbox One X launch. It's all about exclusives. And it will only change when PS5 eventually arrives.
This is what happens when you more than double the resolution.
Best way to sell consoles. Worst way to sell games.
Amazing line up. Great 1st year. But I wonder how the numbers will stake when most of Nintendo fans already had grabbed their consoles. Expanding the market beyond the Wii U towards the casuals is the real deal, notably because of the already giant sales of PS4.
Why so many people against a multiplat launch? You can still play It on PlayStation.
Xbox version? That would be a surprise! Lol
Not according Digital Foundry:
http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...
Like I said: Project Spark with better graphics. Another "do it yourself". Not for me.
Since Sony waited more than 2 years to launch its really significative exclusives, software was not a decisive factor for those who got their PS4 during early days. PS4 was simultaneously cheaper and more powerful than Xbox One. And MS really messed up his console announcement back then. The rest was herd behavior.
Project Spark with better graphics comes to my mind
KNOCK OUT!! Well done! Amazing game.
Are they independent or Microsoft owned? I wonder this could be a multiplatform title.
A game launched in 2008 at US$60.00 would be priced at US$68.78 in 2017 by simply accounting inflation during the period. Meanwhile, development costs skyrocketed. And yet, people think they could buy a more complex and with higher production values game for less. Let's get real: AAA console games are about to crash if this logic prevails. As long as MT and DLCs are optional and someone else, with money to spare, are OK to pay for it, thus helping to fund my hobby of choice, I'm fine!...
"As I stated in a previous article, what drives The Last of Us and makes it such an exemplary game isn’t the gameplay (it’s solid, but not groundbreaking) and it’s not the story (you can describe the whole plot pretty simply, it’s also not groundbreaking)." Oh, my...! Agreed! It's nice to find a fan, not a blind fanboy of this game.
I really dont care. It's an amazing piece of hardware. My daughter is having lots of fun with it, and so am I.