Alpha-Male, the reason why the frame rate on the PS3 version of DA seemed "poor" is because it has V-Sync enabled. It also has more Anisotropic filtering which made all the textures look more clearer.
I think ME2 for the PS3 is in good hands.
You think the hardware and company is bad? Try the consumers.
"oh i like when people take their personnal examples like an universal rule. "
Wait what...???
Based on your own experiences, you're taking your personal example like a universal rule.
Then you go and bash DJMarty.
Kids these days.
BTW, My family we still have 2 phat PS3's with no issues since launch.
Honestly, Windows 7 is one of MS's good products. I've been using it on all my computers at home and so far it works pretty good. Though the occasional incompatibility issue arises here and there, it's nothing worth noting.
Natsu, you're comparing a bunch of custom PS3s to a face plate.
I'm Sold.
Uh the only difference is that they didn't enable V-Sync on the PS3 version. That's it. Nothing else.
If you know what V-Sync is, which I highly doubt, then you'd realize that the framerate on the 360 will drop to 20 and stay at 20 if there is too much action.
But don't get me wrong, I hate screen tearing so the 360 does have the advantage here. But the differences in everything else is non existent.
And seriously, the 360 ...
I didn't even realize that the game was using UE3. Disappointing to say the least. I thought they would try to use the same engine as HS.
It's called a real job, not prancing around with a wrestler's belt.
Except Pach, he's probably rich. lol
I have to admit I caved in and bought Move. 8 hours later after playing with the family, it's money well spent. It does everything as advertised in terms of precision and 1:1 tracking. Though it does get costly, so people should stop using "low-price" as a viable argument.
lol@video
I have some pretty thugged out friends that I recently found out one plays on WoW.
He really doesn't fit the usual demographic to say the least.
The game was pretty terrible. Dissolving enemies, laggy controls, generic weapons, poor voice acting, and mediocre graphics.
Same here, I've never had a problem leaving discs in the tray. The only exception obviously is when moving the console around.
Dan Greenawalt is also a big douche and so is Don Mattrick. Heck, pretty much anyone at Microsoft.
And water makes you wet.
That's true megaton, I guess if we look at the real effect these figures have on people, Kotick impacts a huge portion of the gaming industry while greenberg just talks out of his ass.
Spot on.
Sure Kotick is a money hungry demon, but Greenburg is just a straight up douche.
lol now it's "Evolving your product"
At least it's a creative stealth troll.
The old saying is true here, if you have to upgrade every year on your computer build, "You're doing it all wrong."
The only reason elite PC gamers keep upgrading their cards is because they are addicted to seeing 120-180fps in games. When in reality, to get a playable super smooth experience with everything maxed out, V-SYNC and triple buffering on, 60FPS is more than enough!
Besides, it's all optional. There are pros and cons to console ...
Wow... I guess I fall into this category as well. I finally was able to OC my 965BE to 3.9ghz stable.
Even though at 1680x1050 resolution it doesn't make a huge impact on games and the fact that I play everything with V-Sync on, it's almost pointless for me to OC.
But I do it anyway. Soon, 4ghz here I come!