Just fix the respawn and the claymore stuff, then it start to be a fun cod game..
They could of released this ''sequel'' 2 years ago. I lost my interest with this studio. I'm probably buying it since i still like overwatch, i will give them the benefit of the doubt but i highly doubt that my final impression will change, so my expectations of overwatch 3 is 0, they chose quantity over quality and i don't appreciate that.
Either:
1* you replace the characters to turn the game into a refreshing and unique experience.
2* or offer a huge mode that feels like this is a next gen overwatch.
3* or at least make drastic changes to the old characters.
That's the only way to deliver a sequel to overwatch.
Even if they make one of these options, the graphics need to step up to feel like a next gen overwatch game especially if it is option 3 and ESPECIAL...
Without good Spawn system, i really don't see how the game is ''tactical''. The gameplay is too random and chaotic. If they don't want to fix the spawning, they need to punish the campers by bringing back the old map system or at least creating a perk that spot and punish the annoying type of campers.
The game really need good maps and good spawn system. If they can't do that, i would of included cod 4 maps and settings. People would love that.
Either you replace the characters to turn the game into different experience or offer a mode that feels like next gen overwatch or at least make drastic changes to the old characters. That's the only way to deliver.
Just look at the amount of new content we got when we bought overwatch 1. It felt refreshing and addictive because we had tons of characters to learn, we had tons of maps, the game style was new so the mode was addictive.
Since i was expecting them to keep all the old heros and the maps ( i don't like this decision, i was waiting for many years ), I was hoping for one new addictive mode that turns overwatch into a new exciting experience again. If they made it they didn...
A professional reviewer needs to have some standards that the readers can recognize. Otherwise, why would i trust his opinion ? Opinion without standards, without personality, why would i read his review or accept his feedback or respect his opinion ?
As someone who work in a company, as a journalist and a reviewer, you must build your name, you must show you fairness and your standards alongside your own opinion. If all of that is scratched and all you offer is your opini...
critics:
59 loved it
11 liked it
1 hated it
I don't trust journalists especially in a game that is not made for them but even they enjoyed it.
I really dislike the new maps. Just give us the old maps with the same settings with the same radar , also a realistic mode for these old maps.. then I'm happy with this release.. the new maps are chaotic and unpredictable with no logic on how to play in them, whereas gun fight is more fun because the style of the mode is like cod4 ( I.e. logical ). While in new maps, you have to learn spots of camping even if your style is to push and attack, the more you camp the better the chance you h...
That's the thing, i didn't watch the recent trailers yet i feel like i did, because comments thumbnails, titles keep spoiling the surprises in these trailers. So by summer i will feel like i know most of the game.
I'm not waiting, anyone who want a fresh experience will not wait..
Yes, very real. Developers set the quailty of their games based on console specs not pc.
I don't trust ms so why would i trust you ?
More studios =/= more games because this gen ms kept cancelling their new ips.
More games from me =/= quality games, they could be average like crackdown.
:P
I don't understand why people like you keep saying the multiplayer is killed when it was announced that ND is creating a standalone multiplayer for tlou2. Turning it into standalone means the multiplayer will be bigger and better!
Same thing, PlayStation is in my blood but I was a fan of gears 1 as much as i was a fan of resistance and killzone. :P
Same except that someone bought me a skin in League of legends as a gift to convince me to play with him and I still feel bad that i joined him in this crime, i still freaking remember it.
Isnt Tulsi against this nonesense? If true, as gamers, i think she will be more positive to your life than bernie since she is not an idiot like Trump. She may also stop the iran war and bring back your troops from all these countries and invest the military money on american issues.
But screw logic i guess..
Here is an example of what i am saying. From what i see, the ban is not just about security.
http://immigrationimpact.co...
I'm gonna be a bit off topic , but related in my opinion.
You see, sometimes I don't understand, the goverments of the west claim to be the best nations but sometimes they don't seem to use logic, it is like when america government is blaming immigrants for the awful financial living of Americans, that is just stupid, most of america wealth go to these external wars that only benefit the 1% and the leaders. So all the extracted wealth is hidden and Americans a...
"Guns don't kill people"
"Games kill people"
Hypocrisy. If you use a gun you get a unique rush and unique feeling. A sick person will use that feeling to kill. Some would argue same with video games except video games only cause feelings, you can't use video games to shoot people.
Why don't they ban airing any president that support guns? Or if they insist on this premise that video games is triggering si...
The gameplay is part of the story. You figure out what is happening through the gameplay. That's why it is fulfilling. I don't want to spoil anything else, but that's why there is more into it than hitting enemies with a box. You didn't play it if that's your thought of the game.
If it is not your taste ok, but If you expected an action game with guns , than it is a shame that you don't know what you are buying..