After three great Batman Arkham games in a row, I have no doubt the fourth will be a great game and maybe even the best of the series.
Considering it's far from a success now...probably not.
How to make it a success is to remove the £15/month subscription, and make it so once you've bought the game, its free forever.
Though I've heard the game itself is kinda eh, so getting rid of the subscription might not do much.
You should've made the title of this article "Why Fallout 4 should only be released on PS4, Xbox One and PC."
The title makes people think you're against a PC version instead of last-gen versions.
I'm probably alone on this, but I think this rumored conference is a little underwhelming IMO, it's why I'm hoping this rumor is false and the insider is telling fibs.
Don't take me for a XB1 fanboy or anything, I went with the PS4 over the XB1.
Hopefully, whatever it is they're cooking has an offline Single-Player mode too.
.Fallout 4
.Banjo-Fourie
.Next-Gen Ratchet & Clank or Sly Cooper
.(Extremely Doubtful) New Crash Bandicoot
.New Star Fox
.New Mario or Donkey Kong
That's about it for me, though I can't wait to see whats in store for E3.
I'm looking forward to Star Wars Battlefront and Arkham Knight gameplay.
Oh god no, my main gripe with CoD for the longest time has been how mired and restricted to reality it is.
Anything that can be imaginative, empowering and a bit unrealistic would help break CoD out of it's monotonous cycle. IMO
Agreed, I'll miss Tali, Garrus, Liara and the crew, but if they make equally likeable characters in the new trilogy of games, then it'll be worth the trade.
I hope they don't outright cut out Asari, Turians, Quarians etc and replace them with new species.
I'm perfectly alright with this, I usually don't touch the multiplayer of any game until I've exhausted the single player campaign.
Yes, I'd buy it the day it came out.
I really hope the rumor is true.
Halo Reach (My second favorite Halo game after Halo 2) didn't have Chief either until the last few minutes of the game.
I think Halo can work without Chief.
Yes, I'd love the Mass Effect trilogy on Next-Gen.
If you don't want it, just don't buy it.
Don't spoil it for the people who want it either.
Mycaruba.
I don't care if people think this is a cheap cash grab, I'd love to play the Mass Effect Trilogy on my PS4 with updated visuals, tweaked gameplay, solid 60FPS and maybe the DLC included.
Next-Gen remakes only require a couple of people to do, so the rest of the company would still be working on Mass Effect 4, whilst they could make this remake for people who didn't get to play the series last gen, or big fans of Mass Effect who'd love to play the series optimi...
Well, you're getting the PS3, PS4 and PS Vita versions of the game no matter which version you buy thanks to cross-play.
So three versions of a game for $30 is pretty good, especially seeing how the game is $30, buying the three separately would be $90.
It'll probably be cheaper on PC and Wii-U when it releases for those systems, as there's no cross-buy.
I'm probably going to be drowning in disagrees, but the offerings for May's PS+ are a little underwhelming IMO.
Because Origins is a prequel and not part of the trilogy.
The Arkham Trilogy would start with Asylum, develop in City and end with Knight.
Origins was it's own stand-alone game and wouldn't be counted.
Rocksteady do mention Origins from time to time too, since they gave their blessings to the game, saying Warner games did a good job.
A "smart" way of saying Interquel.
They pretty much mean the game is set after the first Borderlands, but before Borderlands 2
Since the announcement of Arkham Knight, Origins has gotten a lot of hate, but I still think it was a decent addition to the Arkhamverse, nowhere near as good as the previous two, but still good in it's own right.
Arkham Knight is going to be amazing, though.
The Titanfall bundle in the UK is £350, so unless MS hike the price of that bundle up, the kinectless XB1 wont do very well.