I know it's personal preference but I find the dual shock to be much better. The face buttons, d-pad, and the "bumpers" kinda suck on the 360 controller. On the other hand only the triggers suck on the Dual Shock. Besides, there's a reason Sony has stuck with same design for 15 years+.If it ain't broken don't fix it.
EDIT
@soda: childish? In what way am I being "childish"?
BIAS!! haha just kidding.
The PS brand has a long cycle. I mean, look at PS2. it's full power wasn't shown until way late into it's life with God of War III. Sony is gonna do the same thing with the PS3. Nintendo is just gonna keep surviving off Mario (hopefully they make a new Zelda before the end of this gen), and I can't predict what MS will do. Next year the 360 turns 5 which could mean they're ready to drop everything and move on. Then again, they may try to stay in the race a bit longer this time. I really think...
It was getting too long so I had to shorten it up a bit.
Indeed.
The only difference is the brightness levels. Just adjust the TV (something these guys should have done) and it'll be fine.
flame shield can't protect you.
Aaron Greenburg, Dan Greenawalt, and other MS employees can poplulate this list all by themselves. MS has some of the worst (or best if you consider that's their job) PR people ever. I really can't see how they're able to keep a straight face with all the BS they spew.
Oh, and the PS3 launch should not be on there. Just becuase some couldn't afford it doesn't make it bad. Resistance was great and Bluray high definition was just amazing. 600 bucks for a PS3 was a steal.
Be careful with your words. "Some" people here take things way too seriously.
just give up man.
Perhaps MW2 wouldn't be bashed as much had it not been for all the stupid decisions made by IW and Activision. The PC version is actuallY WORSE than COD4 and the console version is almost exactly the same thing. They didn't update the graphics or game play. Basically, they added a few new perks, some maps, and that's it.
It easy to control and responsive. I've got no problems with it. I like the slight weighty field (kinda like KZ2 but not as much).
@raztad
friendlies have a blue triangle (green if they're part of you're squad) above them, enemies do not. It takes some time, but you get used to it.
Here's the problem:
The WHOLE point of Natal is a "controller-less" experience (according to MS) right?
So if a controller is need ALONG with Natal doesn't that make the whole point of Natal redundant? Without a controller, not much can be accomplished, especially not hardcore games such as FPS. I'm curious to see what they do with it, but right now I have little hope for it. I'll buy it if it's cheap, but other than that I don't think MS can deliver on t...
seriously, what's the point of spamming?
lmao jack bot got owned.
infamous is great, but better than MSG3? I don't think so.
So what? MS copied Sega Net with XBL? You moron. They're just offering more services that the competition does except, you ONLY pay for Netflix not for two things.
My PS3 still runs fine as well. I think it's just a problem limited to people who don't take care of their stuff. Maybe they have it to cramped up with no ventilation or something.
The future?
One word: Success.
Why would you even wanna hit a girl in the first place?