The problem with Quest 3 is that its games have PS2 graphics, PS3 at best. Even it's best looking game Asgard Wrath 2 looks a lot worse than AG1, even though it's a 5 year old game. Meanwhile PSVR2 games look mindblowing in comparison.
it's an amazing product at a terrible price and sub par game support, dropping the price together with PC compatibility suddenly makes it much more interesting now.
I can't think of anything more dumb than insulting past games legacy to promote your new game, even more when they were among the best CRPGs ever. The game has to be in really bad shape if they want to promote it that way.
The catched the woke virus after that, saying for MK 10 that "Female Characters Will Be More Realistically Proportioned". You could still rip a spine or blow a head in a bloody explosion, but don't you dare to show a side boob or all hell will break loose.
I loved The Order, ridiculous graphics for it's time and a very interesting setting, it was linear but not as bad as people say. Similar thing with Callisto Protocol, i admit that i played it a long time after release so maybe issues were fixed by then, but it was a fantastic Dead Space-like horror game with some of the best graphics i've seen in my life.
Since when it's a problem that gamers have tools to show publishers and developers that they're discontent with some of their practices. Like any other tool, it can be used or abused unfairly in several cases , but i still think it's useful that consumers have the option to put them in trouble if they think their consumer rights are being damaged.
Wow, so all this story about a black samurai was a lie invented by an associate professor to promote his book, even changing wikipedia entries to promote it? I can't believe Ubisoft didn't consult any japanese experts about this, now Ubisoft is in real trouble for portraying a blatant invention as historically accurate.
amazing horror game and unbelievable graphics, really happy that a sequel is being discussed.
Trailer looks awful.
i'll pass thanks, i'm not purchasing anything from the devs telling me that i have to get used to not owning games, but get used to 70$ AAAA games.
AC Shadows, Star Wars Outlaws, DA Veilguard, i see so many train wrecks in the distance...
If it's going so good, why are they firing everyone and their mother?
The problem with Quest 3 is that its games have PS2 graphics, PS3 at best. Even it's best looking game Asgard Wrath 2 looks a lot worse than AG1, even though it's a 5 year old game. Meanwhile PSVR2 games look mindblowing in comparison.
it's an amazing product at a terrible price and sub par game support, dropping the price together with PC compatibility suddenly makes it much more interesting now.
Holy sh1t this looks incredible, this has passed over Dragon Age like a truck in my case, the story, graphics, combat, everything looks fantastic.
I can't think of anything more dumb than insulting past games legacy to promote your new game, even more when they were among the best CRPGs ever. The game has to be in really bad shape if they want to promote it that way.
Looks great, more!
The catched the woke virus after that, saying for MK 10 that "Female Characters Will Be More Realistically Proportioned". You could still rip a spine or blow a head in a bloody explosion, but don't you dare to show a side boob or all hell will break loose.
I loved The Order, ridiculous graphics for it's time and a very interesting setting, it was linear but not as bad as people say. Similar thing with Callisto Protocol, i admit that i played it a long time after release so maybe issues were fixed by then, but it was a fantastic Dead Space-like horror game with some of the best graphics i've seen in my life.
I'm more worried about how much woke and politically correct it becomes, which would be against all that GTA has always been.
Old man, now that it's even trendy, it's time to step down, Ubisoft is looking worse than ever.
Indeed, it looks almost like a Pixar movie, the ability to pull those graphics in such a weak hardware is insane.
Since when it's a problem that gamers have tools to show publishers and developers that they're discontent with some of their practices. Like any other tool, it can be used or abused unfairly in several cases , but i still think it's useful that consumers have the option to put them in trouble if they think their consumer rights are being damaged.
Wow, so all this story about a black samurai was a lie invented by an associate professor to promote his book, even changing wikipedia entries to promote it? I can't believe Ubisoft didn't consult any japanese experts about this, now Ubisoft is in real trouble for portraying a blatant invention as historically accurate.
"We fire tons of people to make better games!" - Ubi logic.
Also: "you're fired, have a nice summer!", so thoughtful from them.
Disgusting.