The image was used to show an american family with the freedoms to enjoy their life and protect it.
Regardless of the origin of the image it's how it is used by others that can give it different meanings.
In this case the image along with the tweet text ca give it a certain meaning and it doesn't get lost if the image is derived from something else.
And this is the real BS of this writers opinion...they know perfectly well what ...
And what did the quartering say in his defense to the claim?
There are always two sides to any story and usually one of them is hyperbole and wrong.
I'm pretty sure he's mentioned the holocaust in videos regarding neo nazi's and in no way seemed to discredit the existence of the holocaust. In fact the contrary, he and other found it insulting that people should demean the meaning of the word nazi and everything that comes with it and use it as...
Well there isn't much racism in this country compared to others.
In terms of nazis...everyone is a nazi in the sense of wanting their way and forcing things upon others....but there aren't any actual nazi's and presuming as much is an insult to those that actually suffered by the nazi's.
They weren't....but they also weren't anywhere near as popular as they are today.
They were bought early in their studios life and therefore grew and flourished with Sony.
All these other devs that ms is buying grew and flourished without microsoft.
Well of course it is...but not so normal for established devs with records and a great record of games.
The point stands...they simply bought out talent that was already part of mainstream for many years just so that they can say they have xy and z.
Who knows when there will actually be a bethesda xbox console exclusive.
They'll claim that starfield and elder scrolls 6 is part of their 1st party lineup but it's not actually thei...
@why not add gaming pc sales to that as well then?
They play the same games.
Or at this point in time add all xbox consoles into that pile since they all currently play the same games no?
The series sales are combined. Which in my opinion isn't very sensible since the 2 machines are vastly different.
Okay so that's a bit of a waste.
You should always play one game at a time...otherwise you won't finish any. I used to do the same as you but that was when I was like 10.
I just got gamepass for $1. But first I checked the library to see how many games it had that I wanted to play. Since there were plenty....most multiplatform but never the less games I wanted to play....i subbed. All the ones o want to download are on my wishlist and I'm currently play...
Just got a legion laptop and have been playing gears 5 and highest settings, more or less, with about 120+ fps on indoor areas and about 70+ fps outdoor.
If I brought some settings lower that could easily hit the 100+ fps constantly.
Only paid $1 for gamepass....lol
@optimus
Nah not 2,000
A high end gaming pc that cna last you 2-3 generations is about 1,000
Especially if you have previous p...
Sure monetary value...yea.
But how good is that value in terms of the gaming sphere...not good.
It's value that sees the bargain bin pretty quickly.
How is that fortunate....if it sold more then as gamepass content it won't be very useful since they all already bought them.
Nintendo has a reputation for not bringing down the price of anything.
Years later their games are still 60
The real question is resolution. It is the one thing that shouldnt be the focus but is for some stupid reason.
FPS > Resolution.
Having both is ideal but irrelevant as the whole point is that peformance is more important and performance is better when the resolution isnt so damn high.
Just invested in a laptop and will be playing all my games at 1080p and most likely at the highest graphical settings because of it with an incredibly high fps.
...
Well I speaking of a potential future where ALL PS games would launch on pc.
Obviously what is happening right now is concerning but a recent interview with jim ryan causes concern that they intend to do just that. As long as there isnt a huge backlash.
So I see the potential of slowly adding more exclusives to the platform until eventually deciding to shorten the time period between releasing on Playstation and then on PC.
If it stays ...
LOL
Well if you understood the comment you wouldnt be asking.
Where and how does Sony get revenue? Through consoles and all the games they sell on it. Less consoles equals less revenue.
Less revenue equals bad for any company which in this case could affect their studios which create games i like, therefore, I can worry as a consumer of what i like.
Sony would lose.
If all ps games launch also on pc...Sony would lose.
Smarter individuals would win since they'd only need to keep one system for gaming...much cheaper for them.
But Sony would lose in console sales. The same consoles that are driving a lot of their digital store revenue.
You kidding...id totally go to blockbuster!
In fact we were going there instead of gamestop or eb games....whichever was around at the time.
@DJspotty
I think you're forgetting the online aspect. Games with gold for a year is far cheaper than game pass ultimate.
Gamers dont want to pay more for it and they would much rather the offerings improve or if they remove the offerings that they reduce the price to 20$ or 30$ a year.
They want to remove it so that players will be forced into game pass ultimate and pay more. Then remove gwg permanently and then you'll see the ...
No it will not. As is the case with every gen. Whatever naughty dog makes will push at the limits...until then we can only wait.
So many studios and yet not a single release for their next gen console. Except maybe the medium