"Morganfell, the most full-of-himself arrogant POS fanboy on this site had the nerve to call someone else arrogant. "
Says the moron that criticizes others without looking in the mirror, that thinks anyone cares if they are on his ignore list, and that has reading comprehension issues (look at his history). LMAO
Nobody makes financial decisions like that, they are made if the profit rate is acceptable and so far it has been higher on the PS3 side than the 360; but you guys can't even comprehend what "head start" means, so why would you know how to interpret a financial statement.
MUCH better, oh god
That would mean no Xbox fanboys could enter the site.
You're no rocket scientist, you are a welfare moron that spends all his money on games which is why crap like halo sells so much.
Resistance > Edge
Miyamoto? Newell? Levine? Wright? Spector? Carmack? Kojima?
I can only agree in that I would like U3 to have even more gameplay variety. I loved the first uncharted, and the second one is even better, so the same jump from U1 to U2 would be nice. However, changing the core elements of the franchise would ruin it for fans.
If you want bigger levels and more exploration, maybe I agree. But making an open world uncharted like GTA would suck. Also, before making Uncharted fully explorable, I would rather have the environments be completely d...
You simply can't pull off the same *gameplay* with the weak processing power the Wii has.
Activision will buy the reviewers
Where is MS in this lol
You must be desperate to be posting pathetic lines such as "Don't worry Xbox fans. Microsoft know how to get our money". Wow, and I thought X-tards didn't care about technology, and graphics, only sales. Well, I guess time will tell about the graphics (this is obviously rumor, nothing confirmed, only delusional X-tards in need of "hope" will take this as gospel), but you'll still have to wait for the games.
BTW, why is it that no Xbox developer has ever "...
And that's without FFXIII. PS3 has still two holiday season months to go, it'll definitely outsell the Wii in Japan this year. But at least Nintendo fantards can still play the profits game.
Open World? What for? Uncharted is as good as it is by being linear and cinematic. It doesn't need to be GTA. Also, what's the point of setting the game in open environments, so you can backtrack? Developers can arrange for you to be able to go back and forth, you don't need to travel all the levels.
I guess it also needs a first person view to satisfy those FPS fans, and magic of RPG gamers, etc.
By 360 games, do you mean multiplats?
Obviously an X-tard with no high school education will never appreciate the high quality put in games like MGS4.
Anyway, I would only buy a Kindle-like "3G DS" device if I could play the games from any Kindle I want by signing on with my username, OR if I could play from any device. If all my games are locked to a single device or a finite number of devices, then Nintendo can go f*** themselves.
Content providers need to get their sh1t together before planning to go completely online.
A 199 console that breaks
Xbox fanboys, dumb as f*ck. :)
If you only have a Wii and consider yourself a "True Gamer", then you are an idiot. Same with Xbox 360. If you have only a PC, you are just ignorant, but not stupid like the Xtards. Those that have only a PS3 are in the best position as they don't have to pay to play online, they have the most features, most games, best games (it's a fact, not an opinion :P), most exclusives, most advanced technology and you pay less in the long run. It's OK to only have a PS3, and it's also to have...