And I've seen nothing but redundant comments from you ever since you made your account 2 days ago (Which you clearly created for "cleverly" disguised trolling attempts). Nice try, but back under the bridge for you.
I really don't mean to sound biased, but I totally agree. I HAAATE the bright lime green scheme that Microsoft went with this gen. The green and black scheme from the original Xbox looked awesome and futuristic, but the green and white looks awful.
People just love to hate whatever is popular.
In some cases I can agree, like Call of Duty, Hip-Hop music, and Micheal Bay films... But in the case of this game, it's really well made and deserves the praise it's getting.
Thanks to you, I'm never going to that website.
Your disagree'ers hate fun.
To each their own. I found plenty about it to love. Particularly Midna. She was freakin' awesome.
Drive Club for me, definitely has my interest as I Loooove racing sims... But they really didn't give away any information on it other than some world-wide leaderboard stuff which doesn't really sound that interesting. I'm preserving my hype for the game until we see more of it.
Killzone looks gorgeous though :)
Honestly, I felt that Meer was better. Either way, I still perfer playing as females in video games (same went for Mass Effect).
I don't even understand how it's a big deal to choose one over the other.
Reason 1: Cuz Michael Pachturd says so.
Reason 2: The gaming media is very smart.
While it might seem like a joke article at glance, the guy gives some really great (clever and funny also) points. I used to be a Nintendo-Only gamer, and I still have a lot of love for them, but they really need to step up their game. They really should have waited to release the Wii U with upgraded specs along side the releases of the PS4 and Nextbox.
@landog, lol that is a load of crap. I've got the game on both my PC and my PS3 and there is virtually ZERO difference even when you have high resolution mods, etc.
Give it a rest, we know PC games usually look better; that doesn't mean sh*t in this game's case.
Chuck Norris is the opposite of Batman.
Batman FTW
So what's worse... One hundred people who buy a game for $60 that has locked content? Or one person who loses their home, their car, and lives off of food stamps because a Bank took everything they owned?
Sorry but you sound exactly like EA.
Seriously. Gamers, no offense to everyone here, throw such a b*tch fit about EA when in reality, banks like the Bank of America are actually ruining people's lives. I have a buddy who had completely paid off his house from a loan from a local bank, but the bank supposedly didn't get his LAST payment, so they kicked him out of the house and resold it to someone else. Now, he lives in a crappy low income apartment.
Yeah, and EA is the terrible one...
T...
I hope the game is successful. We really don't have enough variety when it comes to developers and it will be really nice to see what people from around the world can come up with.
As for Russian developers... I absolutely cannot wait for Survarium.
#1. Rule of the internet... Don't be an ignorant douche bag.
Well, it might not be #1, but it's definitely up there.
If only more people around here had a sense of humor, lol.
I actually had a thought of how Microsoft can make "Always-Online" bearable. Or at least to the extent someone who doesn't care about privacy can make it. (Not that I'm one of them. I still hate the idea of it)
Assuming MS continues to have a subscription fee next gen, maybe the Nextbox can come with a built-in 3/4G hotspot card (Or something similar) and be capable of actually running off of that internet connection, THEN a part of the subscription fee coul...
Plus (in response to this blog's author), in all fairness, the main reason everyone is talking about the Nextbox, is mostly because of all the rumors of the "Always-On" debacle.
Or maybe "Eye lash" comparisons...
Or "Grains of dirt under fingernail" comparisons...
Either way, it's getting sad at this point, lol.
How are either of those games terrible in any way?