of course it is sales idiots. Patchstation got it right. The console winner was always determined by the sales. why would it be different this time around? Do the rules revolve around the success (or lack thereof) of a sony system? Seems like these fanboys seem to think so.
when a developer doesn't back a game it just means it's ashamed? Like LBP on the PS3 or Okami? is that it? When it's not hyped it just means that it will be a bad game?
considered more tanned? And also, only because Butler played a Spartan doesn't mean he's automatically the perfect choice. That's typecasting and most of the time, it gets tiresome to see the same actor in the same damn role. Besides, Butler voice is so attached to a meme that his voice would be a joke compared to Kratos, so someone else is definitely needed.
was the best on the SNES. I loved that game so much and wish I had bought it instead of just renting it over and over again. I doubt this will function as well as tournament fighters since it will function with only either the wii mote or the GC controller (which isn't idealistic for a fighting game like Street FIghter which, once again, TF was).
next week flop will go back to its ambiguous meanings once again.
I was always under the influence that "flop" meant that it cost tons to make and sold poorly. I'm pretty sure Wii Music didn't cost much to make (other than time).
Nice.
Speaking of die hard fans, where's Sir_Ken... he's been missing all these great articles and I've been missing his massively stupid comments.
It was called The Subspace Emissary and I enjoyed it more than most people did.
but then they would be losing da moneys and be left in third place... like the playstation3.
You've got some catching up to do.
was it it really such a bad game? it was still a zelda game. it was still adicting and it was still an enjoyable release. What about it made it so bad? Graphics?
As opposed to every other year?
I was hoping it was for the DS. Oh well
every comment on this site with profanity gets remarkably high agrees no matter what the actual comment says. for instance, Nicaragua17 said the exact same thing that most people on these comments have written, only that he added a*s... and got 8 agrees where everyone else just got two or three. Am I really the only person here out of high school?
I mean, you made well-founded argument. I guess people just don't like to be shut up and proven wrong. As for the article, I guess SSBB is fun while it lasts. It's big endeavor is when there are more than two people, but I guess most of these people dislike the idea of actually having someone next to them playing unless it's online. Whatever.
it it sure seems EASY to get your panties all up in a bunch over a few words
i guess this would just be more flamebait, but from a legitimate source?
people actually gave you agrees? Well only on N4G could ignorance be praised.
if you asked anyone with a NES they more than likely played it... and loved it. Everyone my age and older has played it, and it's on every greatest games list, and everyone is fond of it. I guess newer generations don't know what it is, but most older gamers do, so I doubt it is underrated since it always gets the recognition it deserves.
it was just difficult as hell. Its stray from the formulaic Zelda game makes it a black sheep, but by no means does it make it a bad game. I know tons of people that consider this one of their top three Zelda games, so I think people are finally starting to appreciate this game more and more.
I thought it was only Sir_Ken, but DNAgent seems to be as good as making excuses as any other ps fanboy. I'm starting to think that the PS3 comes with an excuse manuel for all these tards, they seem so good at them.