As a person with a entry level PC I have a PS4 just for exclusives or if my PC struggles to play something, however I can upgrade my PC at anytime for a few hundred pounds and play games at their most graphicaly enhanced settings with a solid fps over 60.
Edit:
However I do agree it is more convenient imo
I think Xbox wanted to have a console like Steam, even though they had policies that were bad for the average console gamer it would have almost certainly resulted in cheaper digital prices. Although I think they did the right thing with the reversal it could have been something good in the long run, Xbox should stick to their guns next time imo and if it doesn't go well once the policies are in place then do a reversal.
yeah the combat felt like a crappy devil may cry rip off, the dungeons were repetitive and the gameplay was so linear that it didn't feel like a game world more like an alpha build.
Good, DAO was an amazing game that took me 30 hours to complete and the storyline was amazing, that is what I and many other fans want. Saying DA2 felt rushed would be an understatement, I think EA were too impatient with the release of DA2 due to the success of its predecessor and we were punished with a sloppy game that didn't flow at all. From the footage that has been shown of DA3 it looks to be amazing.
Yeah I just don't like the idea of a gun that makes aiming your weapon pointless. If someone beats me in a gnasher battle then it's down to skill, using a sawn off and wall bouncing is very cheap, I might aswell stand still and let them kill me because it's too easy for them.
1) less linear and more challenging campaign
2) more in-depth character development
3) online multiplayer connection optimizations using cloud servers
4) enhanced destructive environments
5) a fresh narrative
6) more innovative multiplayer without making the core gameplay too easy thus lessening the skill gap (retro Lancer, sawn off etc)
7) more customizable features
8) d...
His comment still stands, a unified pool of 8gb gddr5 destroys ddr3 with esram. Backing the esram at this point would be like betting on a 3 legged horse to win a grand national. I personally would have preferred a closer hardware spec between the two consoles.
The only reason I am considering buying an xbone in the future is for GoW 4 nothing else, but imo they need move away from how they developed judgement and refine the gameplay mechanics and connection. Unreal engine 4 will make it look amazing though something to look forward to in the future hopefully.
I'd love to see a remake of RE3 nemesis or a similar gameplay element where the character is always being chased by a bioweapon monster in RE7. Nemesis in high def would be amazing though imo.
Softcore? But that sounds like some sort of fetish porn, either way not very difficult to play imo.
Is this even debatable? If the developer has created the game properly for the PC format especially on the source engine then it will always have better graphics, simple. This should not be about the platform but instead be about respawn entertainment doing their job correctly.
I loved bad company, amazing game imo.
The small learning curve and the non existent skill gap is why this franchise is so popular, almost like the candy crush of console gaming populated by 11 year olds that have microphones. I loved Cod 2 on the Xbox 360 when it was released in 2005 but as soon as online gaming became popular it was all down hill from there on.
Some of the greatest games created can be beaten in a couple of hours once you get past a learning curve and know what to do; that doesn't mean that the content itself is bad.
A single player campaign could have honestly been amazing looking at some if the mp map designs. For me single player is a unique experience that remains with the player long after they have played it like a good novel. Take fallout 3 for example when I first left the vault my initial reaction was "wow" seeing an amazing world waiting to be explored. Don't get me wrong multiplayer can be a fun and thrilling experience with friends but for me a good single player campaign is esse...
In short, the game is not special and does not deserve this amount of attention. However I don't think people should hate on it due to it being an Xbox "exclusive". My comment at first was in reply to people who believe that all ps4 owners are jealous when the game is nothing to be jealous about IMO. I feel lowering a user review score is pathetic but that in no way means I'm sympathetic.
Edit:
I am not trolling, I am allowed to give my opi...
Tbh I don't see what all the fuss is about, the game is above average at best and brings hardley any innovation compared to some up and coming games like watchdogs or Destiny. PC beta was meh and it doesn't even have a campaign, overated EA slop that will attract the fps multiplayer hordes like a carrot on a stick.I'm happy with my PC and ps4 and have no interest in the Xbone that being said I think it is stupid how Sony fanboys are so salty about this game.
BF4 servers on PC are empty, the game is amazing IMO. Titanfall felt boring in beta and extremely over hyped therefore I was unable to enjoy it as much as I wanted to. BF4 was just buggy as hell and the netcode makes the multiplayer feel horrible atm.
Steam sales are better imo, in order to get all of what ps+ has to offer you have to own all the consoles that use the service. Steam on the other hand has sales with £40 games on console for like £5 with all dlc. My steam account is worth over £500 but I've only spent about £70-£80. I have a ps4 and have enjoyed the content that the subscription has provided but ps+ is no match for steam sales IMO.
American satirical comedy isn't very funny is it.