I think my rig cost around 600-700 dollars, can't really be compared because prices are a lot different where i live. Oh by the way, enjoy paying at least 10$ more for your games than i do.
The problem is that the first Crysis looked way better than those screens.
This set the standards? http://xbox360media.ign.com...
Just no.
@The real killer
Oh please, free us from your fanboy crap and open your eyes.
Yes they should try to beat the visual leadership, that the PC and Crytek has....
While move might beat Natal, beating the Wii depends on what you mean by "beating". Also Sony is not that experienced on the casual area, so they are not going to spit out awesome casual motion control based exclusives.
It its going to be good, yes, and more precise than wii also. But it is not going to sell systems, just giving more possibilities to the ones who already own a PS3.
They will never beat the current leader known as Crytek.
This sounds awesome, sadly though the last patch broke my game, so i will refuse to buy this until Bioware fix it (which can take time because of EA).
You do know that this card is most possible 3-4 times more powerful than the PS3's and 360's?
Pc gaming can be both cheap and expensive, depending on what you want, that is what makes it so good.
As long as you still care for the game, and not only for the trophies, i can't really see the problem.
He is a troll, don't even try to comment, just put him on ignore.
While the PC screenshots were technical very good, the art style feels horrible and boring.
The first Crysis looked much better, so try again fanboy.
They should have kept crysis on PC, now they end up with a game, with have mainstream gameplay, and looks worser than the exclusives.
For me, the ending of the first Mass Effect was amazingly epic, i have never tried anything near it.
Those Crysis 2 shots looks worse than Crysis 1 which is kind of sad. Just shows that multiplatforms will never be superior in graphics.
They spend 5 years on the first one, i would love a sequel, but i do not want it to be rushed.
I was actually positively surprised about that review, something i would not expect from Fox News.
The edges looks too antialiased and the shadows to soft to believe that this would really be possible at consoles at the moment. I want something in real time with gameplay before i believe this.
I actually enjoyed Crysis for more than it's graphics. Also i think Killzone 2 looks awesome, i tried Uncharted 2 and that was an awesome game. I'm just tired of fanboys stating that PS3 has the edge in graphics when it do not.