http://www.eurogamer.net/ar... He hasn't reviewed anything on Eurogamer.
Listen brother, there are problems in the media, yes, but the majority of the fervour surrounding supposed "negative" reviews is because the score and tone don't indoctrinate presupposed opinion. In other words, people who get angry and call "bias" (the large majority of N4G users, and beyond) are the ones who...
@Why o why
Offer me proof that he has it in for Sony published games. Otherwise it's like anything else that goes on in these ludicrous threads: Rabble.
Oh chill out kiddos. He substantiates his opinion pretty well essentially saying that Infamous' toolset is a shooter with a skin of electricity. Which just so happens is why I love it, but if that doesn't sit well with him, so be it.
It's a different perspective on the game, at least it makes sense.
Geoff Keighley's rad new polo shirt revealed. Be sure to tune in!
... ughh
Played this a year ago, it's a cool game. Glad to see they've brought it stateside.
flaws
The future is in unmanned systems, and fewer soldiers like this looking foolish.
It'll be good. People need a reality check though: It's just a game. Chill.
I pity the fool who wants to own that movie.
It's a pretty poor adaptation. Granted, it was stupid to make Watchmen into a movie in the first place.
It certainly takes notes from Crackdown and Assassin's Creed. Takes the best parts from each. Sly too, of course, but there's nothing wild about the reviewer's claim.
Kids, stop knotting your knickers.
Way to discount your own point.
This whole good versus evil shtick winds up being pointless in any game.
Ugh, move on Kojima. That's enough metal gear.
Haha, please be real.
An A- is an A-, end of story.
Minority Report.
Though, I refuse to let go the fact that he molested Kubrick's AI into a Haley Joel Osment suckfest.
1000
As long as it hasn't taken away from the singleplayer team, do whatever Naughty Dog.