Sandy take your opinions to the open zone, where all you non gamers belong.
Ignored.
Am I the only one who thinks that people Cliff are a rare breed? He has balls, most developers wouldn't dare publicize something like this, but he does.
Good on him.
After the letdown that was Burnout Paradise this game is looking really fantastic.
I don't know whats with all the Halo 3 hate, but everything is garbage in comparison to COD4.
Straight up.
Did you even read the article?
You sound like another MS hater that will pretty much jump on them for doing anything bad or good. In this case, I completely side with them.
Good day for gamers everywhere.
Honestly, I only have a 360, but I'm buying a PS3 really soon, I don't care about exclusivity at all, but I think that timed exclusivity is the way to go so the developers can build on the lead platform and put as much time into the title as possible.
Unless of course you're Infinity Ward and you can magically build your titles for both consoles without somehow losing any quality...
Bubbles for truth!
COD4 beats Haze with the ugly stick.
God Hand was generic crap. Compare it to greats like DMC4 or Ninja Gaiden and you'd agree.
If you don't, you have pretty bad taste man, no offense.
So the best FPS is a generic piece of crap?
Are people forgetting that the best FPS of all time: COD4, is on PS3?!
What's wrong with these reviewers!?!?!!
Why the disagree, people? It's really unsafe in comparison to Explorer and Safari.
Don't get me wrong, Firefox beats those out on all other fronts though, it's just a concern I have that they haven't seemed to address yet.
So now people are "biased" if they happen to not like Haze and Killzone 2?
I wouldn't say someone is biased if they didn't want to buy Halo 3 and Ninja Gaiden 2, there's no difference and you're being intolerant.
Sonarus-
Actually if you read the interview he did on Kotaku he specifically says that the 360 version is the swan song of the series.
When asked if he plans on making a "swan song" Ninja Gaiden title for the PlayStation 3, Itagaki replied " that would be ridiculous."
Taken from: http://kotaku.com/5008949/i...
Also...
Is it IGN's fault that both Assassin's Creed and Haze didn't live up to the ridiculous hype that UBI built for them?
NO.
It's Ubisoft's fault.
If they want better scores they should make better games.
How many times are they going to do the same article?
I'm done with Gamesradar.
The first one is obviously fake...
No man, the way you conduct yourself is offensive. Be respectful of other peoples opinions. I'm putting you on ignore.
For the record games should be reviewed objectively, however some games should be made an example of so awful trends don't continue. There's nothing wrong with that statement.
I'm starting to get sick of this flamers and trolls on this site. Have fun arguing with yourself.
It was a useless feature and I'm glad they dropped it.
Is anyone really believing these reviews? I mean most of these are obviously damage control from the IGN review.
Wow. I wonder if he can do something like play a real instrument.
"Not bad nonetheless"?
You rated it 3.1/5, that translates to 62/100 or 62%, or a D (minus) ! THAT'S THE LAST THING BEFORE A 'FAILURE' BY MANY MANY STANDARDS.
...Seriously, stick by your score or stick by your review.