but both of them are unrealistic as fuck, sorry. Ive never been in the army, but taking cover for 5 seconds doesnt heal getting shot 5 times.
You can call these fake ass FPS games, "realistic" all day, but the truth is if they made a realistic FPS, NOONE would want to play it.
I think it does, not sure tho.
It is not realistic, no FPS ever will be, SORRY. Untill 1 bullet forces you to crawl or some shit. Calling any game with recharging health "realistic" is probably one of the funniest things about this gen. Its actuall less realistic than halo shields or wolverine, because those games have a reason why it recharges. Ill join the army as soon as they roll out this regeneration tech that I see in every "realistic" war game n...
the world is NOT NORTH AMERICA!!!!
Seeing as this is about NPD, your butthurt is showing.
these games are a rip off of a boy and his blob on NES right?
Its obvious that the reapers will most likely try and attack earth.
In ME2 the collectors are actually going to attack earth, if you follow the story.
The whole series is about humans place in the universe and it makes alot of sense that there will be parts on Earth in ME3.
Not sure if the game they are talking about is ME3, but there is almost no doubt in my mind that shepard will visit earth in ME3.
In me 1 you go to ...
the penalty for dying is giving the other team a point. thats the problem. people ignore the fact that each time the other team kills them, they get a point.
Like the guy above who made up numbers. Its impossible for my team to have 50 kills when the other team has only been killed 25 times.
If everyone on my team has a positive K/D ratio, or the overall team has a positive K/D ratio, it is impossible for the other team to be winning.
Ive considered that many times.
you wrote "One guy goes 40-40, some guy goes 20-12, 20-20. The other team is going 20-5, 10-5, 17-10. Sure they have 1.1+ kdrs but the other team has more points"
That makes no sense even if you say there could be others on the team too. how can one team have 80 kills if the other team has only 20 deaths? they cant.
add up the actual scores going by deaths in your example and the score is really 72-...
in deathmatch games people seem to be oblivious to the fact the the other teams get points when they kill you.
Most people see the way the game ranks by kills and they and try to get more kills but die just as much in the process.
A guy who goes 10-5 is far more helpful to his team than the guy who goes 15-15.
but what does the PC version have to do with the ps3 version being far worse than the 360 version??? nothing.
clearly your off topic comment is trying to negate the fact tah ps3 version is by far the worst of the 3. thats what this is about. Ps3 version sucks, nice off topic spin.
Ohh, have fun playing splitscreen on your PC, ohh wait.
comparing a multiplat that came out yesterday is too emotional for you.
single console owners should stay out of comparisons if you are going to cry about it.
I actually have a 360 and ps3 and was thinking about getting the ps3 version for free internet if my live runs out, not any more.
but please, continue to bitch and moan when this info is not meant for single console owners anyways.
the fact that you have to go completely off topic and do damage controll in an article about a multiplatform game is pretty telling.
Fact is taht the ps3 exclusives will never have a 360 version to compare with, so thats why you go off topic and bring that up. Who knows, from what ive seen so far Id guess that a compressed and multi disc uncharted 2 might look or run better on 360.
honestly, the reason ps3 only owners downplay the visuals of multiplats is...
Id rather hear it from sony. Its weird that they havent given a date yet when its supposed to come out by the end of this year.
This game is probably the only game where they announce the release date in the same month it comes out. crazy.
I loved GT3 so Ill probably get this. I loved collecting a bunch of sweet cars. I wonder if anyone ever got ALL of the cars in a GT game.
you wouldnt have downloaded it.
Obviously you like it enough to DL and play it, and are just to cheap to buy it.
9/10 is not a perfect game so dont get your panties in a bunch.
try working on that self confidence.
me, I look cool no matter what I do.
YOU MEAN KEEP SHOVING IT UP YOUR BUTT, IS THAT YOUR EXCUSE FOR BEING BUTTHURT.
How is someone saying he enjoyd something, "shoving it down your throat."
Looks to me like you made a useless comment on something you havent used, simply because you are butthurt because someone enjoyed kinnect.
THE OLD BUTTHURT ONE.
borderlands on 360 full install was a whooping 3.2 gigs, and that is a current gen game.
Im not saying it could fit both, but it might.
even if they just released halo 1 as is with ONLINE multiplayer instead of just local, this would be great.
is that why devs like Treyarch and others are still lacking features that halo 2 had.
There is such a thing as a stupid question.