I'm also not a fan of that idea, especially since the content you're paying for may not be all that special.
In all honesty the game looks more or less complete. I just wonder what is exclusive to the paying customer.
F2P is Pay to win. That's just the way the game works. I'm not a fan of it personally. The cost of a new game doesn't justify the extra that comes with it. Look at Dark Souls 2 - complete game, high price. Why can't everyone else just do that? Quality sells.
Hype is a dangerous thing.
If it plays like Killzone for the 360 and XBO, why not?
Covered in April :)
http://www.mweb.co.za/games...
As long as the content is strong I don't see why not.
Not a fan of the voice acting I saw on the trailer. The combat looks solid though.
Disagree. I found XBL to be lacking in value-added extras, which is what most people would go for.
i'm a fan of Dark Souls 2 method of punishing you for dying: Lost your HP until you're half the strength you were.
I agree. Great game, much like Diablo 2. Just wished they did this in the beginning.
Yes! Bring him back :D
"Future proofing", I rate :). Those GTX Titans should become cheaper with time also.
The price tag is irrelevent, it's the technology that filters down into other hardware that means more. If it has that kind of performance AMD would have to come up with something quite powerful to match it.
Quite possibly. Lots of other games coming too.
They LOOK good. The sound isn't great :)
SOMA looks terrifying.
I enjoyed using a Warrior in Dark Souls. It'll be interesting seeing how the second pans out.
I loved Dishonored too, and I can see why Thief is an anti-climax in comparison.
BUT I ask will the shortcuts really give that big an advantage?