ARE YOU SERIOUS?
ALL footage are INGAME? HOLY SHIT
NOV IS GOING TO BE AWESOME! Uncharted 3, and then Elder Scroll V:Skyrim!
CRAP I G2 CLEAN MY PANTS
PSfanboy and MSfanboy already had this war about shipped and sold number thing and PSfanboy won the battle. And in this specific case Sony SAID it was shipped, they didn't lie so what's the problem? unlike MS who did and one of core reason why PSfanboy won the whole shipped/sold fanboy war
3D without glasses in 240Hz is BULLSHIT. But HHG is RIGHT about playing video games from 120Hz,240Hz or w/e does make gaming experience "smoother". He says better but it all works out same since if the game plays smoother it does contribute to better experience.
Hz and FPS is different thing people. I have 60inch 60Hz and 42inch 120Hz and when I play my games, you can see the the difference in smoothness. It's a lot easier to tell if you try to watch movie. If y...
no picture or video.
just trying to get hits and troll around.
move on
What I don't understand is why is Xbox360 still $200(and this is that 4GB version)? their hardware doesn't have anything that's worth $200.
What Xbox360 is great in USA is their online service thus bringing very active gaming community. XBL is where Xbox360 has it's worth and gamers already pay for this service(and subscription fee getting higher)
if I'm already paying for XBL, why is the hardware itself cost $200? hardware itself isn'...
god I hope they market this like MAD; TV ads, internet ads, poster ads, have some bundle deal in Bestbuy, Gamestop, Walmart, and all major retail stores.
So that lot of COD players see this, buy this, play this, and never buy another Activision products; particularly in this case COD fanchise that has become just rehashing every year
people need to teach Activision company that they can't just BS consumer and not expecting some kind of retaliation
just the story itself sounds very interesting.
Now can Kojima deliver awesome story telling? and it needs to give some psychological hit on people
@wicko
nope sorry wrong. Have you played this game? or seeing it firsthand? I have this game and I'm not level 40 yet but you definitely see it's progressive.
GameInformer review paragraph 8 says hi:
"Car damage has been requested for years, and now that it’s in there, I find the way it’s presented strange. You unlock it later in the game, and up until that point the damage is cosmetic and slight. Frankly, however, its absence in the begi...
@BryanBegins
I see what you're trying to say but reviewers are getting PAID to review these games. it's their job so they should do it right.
here's a quote from GameInformer:
"Car damage has been requested for years, and now that it’s in there, I find the way it’s presented strange. You unlock it later in the game, and up until that point the damage is cosmetic and slight. Frankly, however, its absence in the beginning of th...
I hope this guy didn't say it in a bad way.
I'd rather have freedom of TOO many choice then lack thereof
another idiot not reading stuff
quote from GameInformer review(just go there check it out)
"Car damage has been requested for years, and now that it’s in there, I find the way it’s presented strange. You unlock it later in the game, and up until that point the damage is cosmetic and slight. Frankly, however, its absence in the beginning of the game only meant that by the time it started to matter, I was past worrying about when it would show up. I sugges...
@Elven6
here's a quote from GameInformer review:
paragraph 8:
"Car damage has been requested for years, and now that it’s in there, I find the way it’s presented strange. You unlock it later in the game, and up until that point the damage is cosmetic and slight. Frankly, however, its absence in the beginning of the game only meant that by the time it started to matter, I was past worrying about when it would show up. I suggest you ke...
O idk you haven't seen Yamaguchi asked by one of other reviewer saying "I'm at level 18 and I still don't see major damage" and Yamaguchi replied with "keep on playing"
and oh idk have you ever read review by GameInformer? why, they exactly talk about this progressive damage/ai.
which reminds me that GameInformer actually plays the games when they review.
let me quote you something from GameInformer review:
it shows IGN is playing around with "words"
let's face it, everyone who saw that lvl40 damage video here knows that the damage system was progressive. so it gets more better/realistic w/e word you want to use as you get better; in this case leveling up more.
you read IGN's review first and then read this BS. in their review it clearly states how disappointing damage was in GT5. Well of course because IGN never really played above level7 or w...
IGN just needs to say sorry we messed up.
Seeing them trying to cover their ass like this just embarrassed them so much
OF COURSE damage doesn't "unlock" but it gets "better"
it just shows they're just trying to play around with the words; what are they? lawyers?
please remake these games that was actually great games when it was just Square. Once Enix took countrol my god what the just happened to quality? after FFX it was just so, so, bad.... my god
both game needs to use their maximum AI. We now know how GT has progressive AI/damage that got widely known by owning some review sites (big LOL to IGN; i love these guys, they always make me laugh)
test needs to be down when GT career level is 40
Haha
I laugh at people who calls Forza series as SIM. please man stop it
Only mainstream reviewer I found who knew about this progressive AI/damage was GameInformer. That just made me feel even more secure that I choose to sub their mag and that now I can give more respect to them.
IGN on the other hand... ROFL. Even if they re-review it, damage has been done already and now I won't even consider their review to buying into games
omg Chrono Cross? HELL YEAH I bet when I play this JRPG I'll question just what happened to JRPG that was so good... I miss these classic titles...
I'm buying it for sure.